| Message-ID: <20230309214838.GA1720611@telecomdigest.us>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 16:48:38 -0500
From: Bill Horne <malQRMassimilation@gmail.com>
Subject: USF Tracker - February 2023
By Kelley Drye & Warren LLP (New York)
General
On February 28, 2023, in the School and Libraries docket, CC
Docket No. 02-6, and in the Contribution Methodology docket, WC
Docket No. 06-122, the Wireline Competition Bureau (WCB) issued a
Public Notice (DA 23-141) announcing the grant, dismissal, or
denial of various requests (such as requests for review, requests
for waivers, and petition for reconsideration) related to actions
taken by the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC).
https://www.mondaq.com/article/news/1290676?q=1803232&n=722&tp=2&tlk=11&lk=26
--
(Please remove QRM for direct replies)
|
| Message-ID: <20230309213558.GA1720260@telecomdigest.us>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 16:35:58 -0500
From: Bill Horne <malQRMassimilation@gmail.com>
Subject: Reconsideration Of Subscriber-Level ACP Data Collection
By Michael Dover (Los Angeles)
A key aspect of the FCC’s ACP Transparency Data Collection rules may
be in doubt if the FCC takes up a recent petition for reconsideration.
In its Fourth Report and Order and FNPRM, the FCC adopted an
aggregate-level approach for collecting ACP subscriber pricing and
plan information, finding that ACP providers should submit ACP
subscriber data grouped by each unique plan for a given geographic
area (such as by state) rather than submitting that data through
National Lifeline Accountability Database (NLAD) at the time of
enrollment. Relying on provider comments discussing the administrative
burdens of subscriber-level data collections, the FCC reasoned that
“the subscriber-level approach as proposed by the Commission may
conflict with the statutory requirement to stand up an annual
collection and may be too administratively burdensome for subscribers
and providers, particularly with respect to obtaining subscriber
consent to the collection of additional subscriber-specific data and
in light of privacy concerns.”
https://www.mondaq.com/article/news/1290594?q=1803232&n=722&tp=2&tlk=10&lk=25
--
(Please remove QRM for direct replies
|
| Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.64.2303122225110.16518@panix3.panix.com>
Date: 12 Mar 2023 22:31:17 +0000
From: "danny burstein" <dannyb@panix.com>
Subject: Does anyone know where to find reg. about cell phones and
"911" ...
Where [are] the regulations mandating cellphones (whenever technologically
capable) be allowed to make "911" calls, whether or not the cell phone
is registered, has an account with the local cellco or, for that
matter, even has a SIM in the phone?
The reason I'm asking is, well, first, I can't find the actual text,
and second, I tried making calls to "988" (the suicide prevention
number) without SIMs, etc. to test it out and they were blocked, so
I'd like to double check the language before following up.
Thanks to everyone who's about to point out this is right there in
front of my eyes - and making me slap my forehead.
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
dannyb@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
|
