|Re: 2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns|
|Scott Dorsey (email@example.com)|
30 Jul 2006 18:00:36 -0400
> Is there any information out there that would indicate which is|
> safer/healthier to use ... a 2.4Ghz or 5.8Ghz cordless phone?
> I'm not trying to get into a discussion of whether cordless phones
If gophers could read, what books would they choose? Well, the truth
As far as RF exposure is concerned, nobody has provided any real
If you're worried, use a beltpack unit and hold it away from your
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
|Post Followup Article||Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply|
|Go to Next message: John Levine: "Re: Cingular Analog/TDMA Surcharge"|
|Go to Previous message: NOTvalid@Queensbridge.us: "Re: NYC Broadband"|
|May be in reply to: firstname.lastname@example.org: "2.4Ghz vs. 5.8Ghz Cordless Phones and Health Concerns"|
|TELECOM Digest: Home Page|