|Re: Another Year, Another Volume of the Digest|
|Bob Goudreau (BobGoudreau@spam-poison.com))|
Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:50:15 -0500
> Figure it this way: 1981 from 2006 leaves 25 does it not?|
Yes, and (Volume) 26 from (Volume) 1 also leaves 25. The Digest started
> Originally August 1981 through December 1981 a partial volume.
Volume 1 = 1981
Volume n = 1980 + n,
Which is why Volume 26 should = 1980 + 26 = 2006.
> During all of year 2001 I was in convelesance which was most of volume 20
Not expecting you would, just wondering about the anomaly. Thanks for
[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: But just as on January 4, if you were
|Post Followup Article||Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply|
|Go to Next message: Jim Rusling: "Re: Oklahoma-Texas Fires, California Mud Slides-Floods"|
|Go to Previous message: Steve Sobol: "Re: Schools Make Parents Pay For Computers Before Kids Log on"|
|TELECOM Digest: Home Page|