TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Surveillance Cameras More Common Everyday


Surveillance Cameras More Common Everyday


Lisa Minter (lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com)
17 Apr 2005 17:06:21 -0700

By SIOBHAN McDONOUGH, Associated Press Writer

It's there when you ride an elevator and make a purchase in a
store. There's no escaping it in a museum. Look up at the stoplight
and a camera may be watching you.

Being lens-shy just doesn't cut it in today's camera-crazed
world. Chances are, during a good part of your day, there's a camera
nudging into your private space.

There's no doubt surveillance cameras can aid police and protect
property. Videos showing crimes are played routinely on news programs
to help catch perpetrators.

But those same cameras can make people feel violated and uneasy. Their
broad sweep makes no distinction between revelers at a parade and
wrongdoers at a riot. And they never blink.

"I don't like to be watched," said K. Ann Largie, 29, of Laurel,
Md. "It makes me feel uncomfortable."

Nikki Barnett, 31, of Burtonsville, Md., stopped showcasing her "happy
dance" in elevators after learning many of them are monitored by
cameras. "I stopped doing silly things," she says. "I don't want to
portray myself in a certain light."

Closed-circuit cameras are spreading in cities, a trend hastened by
concerns about terrorist attacks but by other reasons, too, including
the mere availability of the technology.

"If I'm mugged at an ATM, I'm glad the bank has cameras so the person
can be tracked down," said Justine Stevens, 32, of Arlington, Va. "But
cameras in elevators monitoring behavior seems weird."

Indeed, for every videotaped image of a crime that leads to an arrest
there are dozens of perfectly innocent moments captured.

"Cameras used for specific suspects and at specific times, that's good
law enforcement," said Peter Swire, professor of law at Ohio State
University. "But I don't want it part of my permanent record every
time I scratch myself on a public street."

In Nashville, Tenn., a middle school installed cameras that parents,
in a $4.2 million lawsuit, said captured their kids in various stages
of locker-room undress. School officials say the cameras were put up
in plain view to watch an outside door and hallway.

Perhaps nowhere are cameras more ubiquitous than in the nation's
capital: federal buildings, museums, parks, traffic lights.

Some are discreetly placed in elevator ceilings and lamp posts. Others
are more obvious, such as one fixed near an American flag adorning the
Justice Department.

Some closed-circuit cameras run around-the-clock. Others come on for
specific events. In Washington, 14 police cameras roll during parades,
demonstrations and when the city goes on high alert. They are turned
on a half-dozen or so times a year, and the police department
publicizes it.

Kevin Morison, the department's spokesman, said
there was a lot of hyperbole when the cameras were introduced. Critics
claimed police were watching people leave home to go to work, then
come home at night. "Frankly, we have no interest in doing that, or
capacity to do that," he said.

That system is part of a larger one. At a police command center, feeds
from those cameras are watched along with those from the city's subway
system, transportation department and more.

Critics contend the camera lies or at least misleads. An innocent
conversation can appear conspiratorial, depending on the angle, the
lighting or many other factors.

But Paul Rosenzweig, senior legal research fellow at the conservative
Heritage Foundation, said today's world demands that people be more
open to the use of cameras.

"You can't sweep back the tide of technological development and you
can't blink your eyes to necessity," he said. "We are in a changed
circumstance today. For us, September 11 brings it home."

Chicago is working on plans to link more than 2,000 public
surveillance cameras in a network that would use sophisticated
software to alert authorities to potential crimes.

In Los Angeles, the police department recently deployed a remote
camera surveillance system that is used to identify, track and record
criminal activity in some parts of the city. The system is equipped
with "intelligent" video capabilities and facial recognition software.

New Orleans is installing a sophisticated crime-fighting system of
bulletproof cameras, each capable of eyeing an eight-block area. So
far, about 240 of the proposed 1,000 cameras are in operation.

New Orleans officials say their system has plenty of safeguards
against abuse. Cameras are not routinely monitored and video is stored
for a brief period, to be watched if a crime is reported. Only a few
officers have access to the video and they look at it only in response
to a specific report, officials said.

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily.

Please note _two new features added today: _Consumer Reports_ regards
telecom equipment and a scan of the better quality blogs on the net.
Both are now part of Telecom Digest Extra, and updated daily.

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Jack Decker: "Packet8 Imposes $1.50 Regulatory Recovery Fee - Chance to Cancel"
Go to Previous message: Barry Margolin: "Re: Last Laugh! Honesty on the Internet"
Next in thread: FrazNor@gmail.com: "Re: Surveillance Cameras More Common Everyday"
May be reply: FrazNor@gmail.com: "Re: Surveillance Cameras More Common Everyday"
May be reply: jmeissen@aracnet.com: "Re: Surveillance Cameras More Common Everyday"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page