|Re: Blackboards vs. Whiteboards|
|T. Sean Weintz (firstname.lastname@example.org)|
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 21:35:16 -0500
> I believe black/greenboards cost less than whiteboards.
I would expect a good quality, real slate blackboard (the kind I had
> But most significantly is the chalk vs. marker.
> Chalk is much cheaper than markers.
> Markers always run out quickly.
Yup. However I have seen some good enameled white boards that DON'T
> Lastly, markers have that weird chemical smell.
And teenagers can sniff them ... Happens when you give them glue,
> Seems to me there's nothing wrong with blackboards and nothing to be
Initially they may be cheaper to install new. It's a losing
> Thoughts anyone?
|Post Followup Article||Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply|
|Go to Next message: Mark Atwood: "Re: Blackboards vs. Whiteboards"|
|Go to Previous message: Barry Margolin: "Re: Blackboards vs. Whiteboards"|
|May be in reply to: email@example.com: "Blackboards vs. Whiteboards"|
|Next in thread: Mark Atwood: "Re: Blackboards vs. Whiteboards"|
|TELECOM Digest: Home Page|