|Re: British TV License (was America the Worst For Cell Rates and|
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:12:53 -0800
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 18:50:19 -0800, Mark Crispin|
> Actually, it matters in that we choose not to fund PBS with voluntary
And you can thank Mark's radical right brethren for that.
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:54:02 -0500, Tony P.
> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
>>> So, if I am in the UK with an NTSC TV set (or just a monitor)
>> Yes you would. You own a TV set capable of receiving BBC. Regardless
> I beg to differ. NTSC and PAL are two different animals. The UK and it's
It's *generally" true that NTSC is used in the Americas. It's also
http://kropla.com/tv.htm (world television standards)
|Post Followup Article||Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply|
|Go to Next message: Scott Dorsey: "Re: British TV License (was America the Worst For Cell Rates and"|
|Go to Previous message: Mark Crispin: "Re: British TV License (was America the Worst For Cell Rates)"|
|TELECOM Digest: Home Page|