32 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for January 12, 2014
====== 32 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:45:44 -0800 (PST) From: Neal McLain <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: OTT and 4K: Vaporware and a field of dreams Message-ID: <email@example.com> By Josh Wein, FireceOnlineVideo, January 8, 2014 | Headlines from the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas are | heralding the arrival this year of two would-be milestones in | online video: a full-fledged online pay-TV service and | streaming 4K. For separate reasons, neither may ever | materialize into mainstream consumer products. | | I hope they do. As a consumer, I'd like to be able to buy (and | cancel) pay-TV service with the same ease and convenience of | adding or dropping a Hulu or Spotify subscription. And 4K | sounds great. I haven't seen the demos yet, but reports seem | genuinely impressed with its quality and prospects. In that | way, it differs from the 3DTV, which elicited far more | skepticism. | | To mix metaphors a bit, 4K is a field of dreams while the | online pay-TV service is still vaporware. Continued: http://www.fierceonlinevideo.com/story/ott-and-4k-vaporware-and-field-dreams/2014-01-08 Neal McLain
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 04:28:55 +0000 (UTC) From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Garrett Wollman) To: email@example.com. Subject: Supreme Court to weigh in on Aereo Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> As widely expected, the U.S. Supreme Court announced today that it would review /ABC v. Aereo/, one of a number of cases involving Aereo's remotely-operated-broadcast-tuner service and similar offerings from other companies which have been covered in this newsgroup previously. Oral argument should be scheduled for this spring. Justice Alito is recused from the case. If, after oral argument, the eight remaining justices divide 4-4, the result will be to uphold the decision below, which Aereo won, but without setting a binding precedent for the other circuits. However, given that there are other petitions pending that present the same issue, the justices apparently expect that they will be able to resolve this issue precedentially -- otherwise they would have agreed to review a different case in which Justice Alito was not recused. Usually such recusals are the result of a justice either having a personal connection with the case (e.g., when the court reviews a case decided by Justice Breyer's brother, Justice Breyer recuses himself), or when a justice has a financial interest (such as stock ownership) in one of the parties; the justices, however, rarely give reasons for their recusals. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | What intellectual phenomenon can be older, or more oft email@example.com| repeated, than the story of a large research program Opinions not shared by| that impaled itself upon a false central assumption my employers. | accepted by all practitioners? - S.J. Gould, 1993
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 18:38:22 -0800 (PST) From: Neal McLain <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Aereo: Supreme Court Bound! Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> By Harry Cole, CommLawBlog, January 10, 2014 Poster's note: as I indicated in a previous message, "Cert" = certiorari, an order issued by the U.S. Supreme Court to a lower court (typically one of the Courts of Appeals) indicating that the Supreme Court will accept a case for further review. The Court issued cert in the Aereo case today. Alito recused himself, thus opening the possibility of a 4-4 split decision. If that were to happen, the Second Circuit's decision favoring Aereo would stand. | Broadcasters' cert petition is granted; Alito recuses himself, | Kagan doesn't | | The Supreme Court has decided that now would be a good time to | consider the arguments arising from the Second Circuit's Aereo | decisions to date -- so the Supremes have granted the petition | for certiorari filed by the broadcaster parties to the Second | Circuit case. While this could ordinarily bode well for the | broadcasters -- after all, if the Supreme Court thought the | Second Circuit got it right, they could just deny cert and let | the Second Circuit's action stand -- you can probably expect | Aereo to claim something of a victory here because, as we have | previously reported, Aereo itself urged the Court to take the | case. | | As of this writing the briefing and argument schedules haven't | been posted on the Supreme Court's website. Since the Court | will be hearing arguments until the end of April, it seems | reasonably likely that the Aereo case will be briefed and | argued this term, which would mean that a decision from the | Court by the end of June would be a near certainty. Continued: http://www.commlawblog.com/2014/01/articles/broadcast/aereo-supreme-court-bound/ Neal McLain
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2014 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.