32 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
Previous Issue (Only one)
The Telecom Digest for April 17, 2014
====== 32 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 01:50:38 -0400 From: Monty Solomon <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: All sent and received e-mails in Gmail will be analyzed, says Google Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> All sent and received e-mails in Gmail will be analyzed, says Google The new text might be a reaction to the e-mail scanning lawsuit. by Casey Johnston Apr 15 2014 Google added a paragraph to its terms of service as of Monday to tell customers that, yes, it does scan e-mail content for advertising and customized search results, among other reasons. The change comes as Google undergoes a lawsuit over its e-mail scanning, with the plaintiffs complaining that Google violated their privacy. E-mail users brought the lawsuit against Google in 2013, alleging that the company was violating wiretapping laws by scanning the content of e-mails. The plaintiffs' complaints vary, but some of the cases include people who sent their e-mails to Gmail users from non-Gmail accounts and nonetheless had their content scanned. They argue that since they didn't use Gmail, they didn't consent to the scanning. ... http://arstechnica.com/business/2014/04/google-adds-to-tos-yes-we-scan-all-your-e-mails/
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 11:53:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Neal McLain <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Aereo will have tough time proving its case, legal experts say Message-ID: <email@example.com> By Jim Barthold, FierceCable, April 16, 2014 Aereo is going to have a hard time proving its right to exist when takes its case to the Supreme Court April 22, according to legal experts asked to handicap the proceedings. That's because, in addition to broadcasters who have from the start objected to the company's use of their free over-the-air signals, the U.S. Solicitor General and Copyright Offices also oppose Aereo. "I think the majority of the court will be skeptical of Aereo's position and thus likely to rule in favor of the broadcast-petitioners," Pratik Shah, of the law firm Akin Gump told the Hollywood Reporter. The case revolves around Aereo's right to pluck over-the-air broadcast signals and redistribute them to subscribers who pay $8 to $12 a month for an Internet service over TVs, PCs or connected mobile devices. The broadcaster argue that the content is copyrighted and that they should be paid fees similar to the retransmission fees they receive from pay TV operators in the cable, satellite and telco space. So far, the broadcasters have been on the short end of that argument, losing in federal court in Manhattan and in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Their last gasp--and if they win, Aereo's last gasp--is now in the hands of an eight-member Supreme Court where Justice Samuel Alito has recused himself. Continued: http://www.fiercecable.com/story/aereo-will-have-tough-time-proving-its-case-legal-experts-say/2014-04-16?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal -or- http://tinyurl.com/lv6sxnf Barthold seems to have forgotten that the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled for plaintiffs -- even though he wrote the article about it for FierceCable: http://www.fiercecable.com/story/aereo-shuts-down-denver-and-salt-lake-city/2014-03-10?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal -or- http://tinyurl.com/q7j8l56 Alito's decision to recuse leaves the Supreme Court with eight justices, and thus the possibility of a 4-4 decision. In such cases, the decision of the lower court usually stands. But in this case, lower courts have reached conflicting decisions: - The First and Second Circuits ruled for Aereo. - The Tenth Circuit rules for plaintiffs. So now what will the Supremes do? Stay tuned. Neal McLain
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:43:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Neal McLain <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Broadcasting is about to change, regardless of Aereo lawsuit's outcome Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> By Samantha Bookman, FierceOnlineVideo, April 15, 2014 Next Tuesday, the Supreme Court takes up the issue of whether Aereo is violating copyright law by providing over-the-top streaming of broadcast channels through its antenna-DVR service. While it's not known which way the justices will rule, or when--the case could continue well past next week--media and technology organizations are already taking sides. But even though a decision for the broadcasters could spell the end for Aereo as an entity, does it really matter in the long run? Online video is clearly here to stay, and consumer demand for content that is easy and cheap to access, anytime, anywhere, will likely overwhelm the broadcast industry's protectionist stance. Gary Shapiro, head of the Consumer Electronics Association, has a deep interest in the case: He was involved in the landmark 1985 Sony Betamax video recording case, on which Aereo's argument is partly based (it also draws on the 1982 Cablevision case). The CEA filed an amicus brief with the Court last week supporting Aereo. Continued: http://www.fierceonlinevideo.com/story/broadcasting-about-change-regardless-aereo-lawsuits-outcome/2014-04-15?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal -or- http://tinyurl.com/k6mcvcl Neal McLain
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2014 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.