33 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
Copyright © 2014 E. William Horne. All Rights Reserved.
The Telecom Digest for Oct 8, 2014
|We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh|
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details.
|Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 13:42:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Neal McLain <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: Incentive Auctions Message-ID: <email@example.com> On Monday, October 6, 2014 9:18:48 AM UTC-5, Fred Goldstein wrote: > On 10/5/2014 10:31 PM, danny burstein wrote: > >> In <firstname.lastname@example.org> email@example.com >> (Garrett Wollman) writes: >>> VHF spectrum in general is very undesirable because of the required >>> size of antennas. > >> But does the over-the-air coverage pattern, so to speak, really >> matter that much to many of the broadcasters these days? As long >> as they meet FCC requirements to "serve the area" (term used >> loosely) well enough to be able to get into the various mandated >> "cable shall carry" deal, they'll still be printing money. > > Nominal (per FCC contour maps) coverage matters if a station wants > must-carry. True for NCE (non-commercial educational stations. 47 CFR 76.55 Definitions applicable to the must-carry rules. (a) Qualified noncommercial educational (NCE) television station. (b) Qualified local noncommercial educational (NCE) television station. http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/47/76.55 47 CFR 76.56 Signal carriage obligations (a) Carriage of qualified noncommercial educational stations. http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/47/76.56 NCE stations do not have retransmission consent rights. However, full-power commercial stations have must-carry rights throughout their Designated Market Areas (subject to numerous exceptions). DMAs are defined by Nielsen Media Research and do not correspond to FCC contour maps. DMAs usually follow county lines but some large counties (e.g. San Bernardino County California) are split between two DMAs. 47 CFR 76.55 Definitions applicable to the must-carry rules. (c) Local commercial television station. http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/47/76.55 47 CFR 76.56 Signal carriage obligations (b) Carriage of local commercial television stations. http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/47/76.56 Full-power commercial stations also have retransmission-consent rights. 47 CFR 76.64 Retransmission consent. http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/47/76.64 > Bear in mind, though, that must-carry is normally only invoked by > stations that aren't particularly desirable. A station may choose > to either invoke must-carry, in which case cable doesn't pay it > anything, or it can demand payment per subscriber. The big network > stations are demanding ever-higher payment -- that's why TWC briefly > dropped ABC in New York a couple of years ago. (ABC usually > requires cable to pick up a bunch of channels in a package, > including the ridiculously-expensive ESPN, just to carry the local > station.) True for Commercial stations. However NCE stations do not have retransmission consent rights. Neal McLain|
|Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:53:42 -0400 From: Barry Margolin <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Bluetooth people trackers in payphone kiosks in NYC Message-ID: <barmar-8EB4CA.firstname.lastname@example.org> In article <email@example.com>, Pete Cresswell <PeteCress@invalid.telecom-digest.org> wrote: > Per danny burstein: > >www.buzzfeed.com/josephbernstein/exclusive-hundreds-of-devices-hidden-inside- > >new-york-city-ph > > I thought my device had to consent to be paired with another BlueTooth > device. > > The article seems to suggest that a nearby BlueTooth device can pair > with my phone with no interaction from me. > > Can somebody explain? Here's some more information about iBeacon: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBeacon It doesn't go into much detail about this, but I gather that Bluetooth Low Energy doesn't require the devices to pair with each other explicitly. It seems to be the same technology used for using a smartphone to pay for something by holding it next to the POS terminal. The beacon simply broadcasts its UUID, and the mobile device may send back its UUID in response. For many uses, the device doesn't have to respond -- the iBeacon-enabled application uses the beacon's UUID to determine its location, and display appropriate information or ads. The way you're tracked isn't by detecting the device directly. Rather, it's because the application needs to look up the beacon's UUID over the Internet, to find out what it should display. The server that provides this information can record information about which device queried it, and which beacon it was looking up. -- Barry Margolin, firstname.lastname@example.org Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me ***|
|Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 16:36:39 -0400 From: Pete Cresswell <PeteCress@invalid.telecom-digest.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Bluetooth people trackers in payphone kiosks in NYC Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Per Barry Margolin: >***** Moderator's Note ***** >... What I want to know is how the beacons can report on the location >of a cell phone that's nearby, and how such use became possible >without cellphone owners apparently being aware of it. Thanks. I feel vindicated... Now we need somebody to tell us how this stuff happens without the target cell phone's consent.... -- Pete Cresswell|
|Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2014 13:59:38 -0400 From: Barry Margolin <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: Bluetooth people trackers in payphone kiosks in NYC Message-ID: <barmar-9979CC.email@example.com> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Pete Cresswell <PeteCress@invalid.telecom-digest.org> wrote: > Per Barry Margolin: > >***** Moderator's Note ***** > >... What I want to know is how the beacons can report on the location > >of a cell phone that's nearby, and how such use became possible > >without cellphone owners apparently being aware of it. > > Thanks. I feel vindicated... > > Now we need somebody to tell us how this stuff happens without the > target cell phone's consent.... When you install an app that uses iBeacon, that's the consent. Hopefully the app allows you to opt in/out of using this (unless, of course, that's the only point of the app). - - Barry Margolin, email@example.com Arlington, MA *** PLEASE post questions in newsgroups, not directly to me *** ***** Moderator's Note ***** Since the company serves multiple cities, including mine, please tell the readers how to spot "beacon-enabled" aps. This kind of thing worries me. Bill Horne Moderator|
|Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 12:36:37 -0400 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: New York City orders tracking devices turned off Message-ID: <20141007163637.GA28099@telecom.csail.mit.edu> After BuzzFeed revealed late Sunday that a digital advertising firm, Titan 360, was using public pay phones in New York City (yes, they still exist) to host Gimbal Bluetooth tracking beacons, the mayor's office has now ordered them to come down. The beacons can be used to log nearby phones. Bluetooth addresses and mark the date, time, and location where they are seen. As such, the beacons can be used as a way to track physical movements of cellphone users, potentially allowing advertisers to serve those phones customized spots. (Users who have Bluetooth turned off on their phones will not be seen by the beacons.) Rest at: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/10/new-york-city-orders-bluetooth-beacons-in-pay-phones-to-come-down/ -or- http://goo.gl/UvTIk3 -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my email address to write to me directly)|
|Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 13:33:55 -0700 From: email@example.com (David Platt) To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: Bluetooth people trackers in payphone kiosks in NYC Message-ID: <email@example.com> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Pete Cresswell <PeteCress@invalid.telecom-digest.org> wrote: >>www.buzzfeed.com/josephbernstein/exclusive-hundreds-of-devices-hidden-inside-new-york-city-ph > >I thought my device had to consent to be paired with another BlueTooth >device. > >The article seems to suggest that a nearby BlueTooth device can pair >with my phone with no interaction from me. Look up BTLE ("Bluetooth Low Energy"). It's a somewhat different beast than "classic" BlueTooth.|
|Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:00:37 -0400 From: Charles Jackson <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: Incentive Auctions Message-ID: <CANog7L5v2s=EPih=uarv+1o1HcLTnBzAgQjysXGtsLZhnSE1qw@mail.gmail.com> Bill Horne wrote: > The "VHF Spectrum" Fred referred to is the group of channels I had > suggested might be made available for "5G" data or other > cellular-related use: he was pointing out that cellular providers > don't like VHF because the wavelengths, and thus the antennas, are too > long for use in compact cellphones. > > Shorter wavelengths means shorter cellphone antennas, which means that > the Low-VHF spectrum is being shunned by cellular licensees: a > consideration which I had not thought of. Well, not really shunned. There's just been no opportunity to license that spectrum for cellular. The older IMTS (pre-cellular wireless telephone) systems operated at 450 MHz or so. There is also the problem of substantial man-made noise in the VHF band. The incentive auction process will free up some spectrum at 600 MHz for wireless. There's an extensive discussion of issues such as filtering and antenna bandwidth in the technical appendix to the FCC order regarding the incentive auction. (FCC 14-50 Report and Order in GN Docket 12-268). "Modern research is looking at much higher frequencies for wireless. We already have Wi-Gig (60 GHz). People are proposing using millimeter waves for commercial wireless." "Over 20 GHz of spectrum is waiting to be used for cellular or WLAN traffic in the 28, 38, and 72 GHz bands alone, and hundreds of gigahertz more spectrum could be used at frequencies above 100 GHz." [from Rappaport, Theodore S.; Heath, Robert W., Jr.; Daniels, Robert C.; Murdock, James N. (2014-09-09). Millimeter Wave Wireless Communications (Prentice Hall Communications Engineering and Emerging Technologies Series) (p. 3). Pearson Education. Kindle Edition.] Fred Goldstein wrote: > The other problem is bandwidth. TV channels are 6 MHz wide, and the > whole VHF range is not all that big. So if there is some pressing need > for mobile access to cat videos in higher resolution than can be > provided in 4G LTE, then it will no doubt need wider channels. That > again points to higher frequencies. Right, as the quote above from Rappaport et al. points out, if you want GHz of bandwidth, you have to go to much higher frequencies. Wi-Gig claims data rates up to 7 Gbps. But, as I understand it, the Wi-Gig systems deployed today can only reach about 4.5 Gbps. (Only 4.5 Gbps!) But, that is in a 2 GHz+ bandwidth channel. Chuck ***** Moderator's Note ***** The IMTS system used both the 150 MHz high-VHF band, and the 470 MHz UHF band. There was also an older manual system, called "MTS", which operated in the 40 MHz region. The UHF units were only for IMTS, but VHF IMTS mobile phones could be used in areas that still had only manual service. Bill Horne Moderator|
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.
TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne.
The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright © 2014 E. William Horne. All rights reserved.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself. Thank you!
All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.