31 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for January 9, 2013
====== 31 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 20:09:29 -0500 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Post-Sandy repairs going slowly in New York Message-ID: <20130109010929.GA1967@telecom.csail.mit.edu> By JIM DWYER Published: December 6, 2012 There is now more deserted office space in Lower Manhattan because of Hurricane Sandy than there are offices in many cities. Mobile boilers line the streets. Portable generators are stacked to the curbs. Ventilation tubes coil around scaffolds, snake above sidewalks, quiver and pulse. It is as if bodies had been turned inside out, exposing the hearts, lungs and organs that are normally internal. Of course, these devices keep the buildings running in some limited ways. Still, 15 million to 18 million square feet of space is unusable, about as much as exists in any condition whatsoever in cities like Miami, Phoenix and San Diego. It is not enough to have generators that keep a few elevators and a bank of fluorescent lights running. The telephones are not working. And it turns out that under the current schedule for repairs, Verizon will not be finished until May, a fact Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg dropped into a speech on Thursday morning. "That is just not acceptable," Mr. Bloomberg said. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/07/nyregion/empty-offices-seem-poised-to-remain-so-in-lower-manhattan.html?ref=verizoncommunicationsinc -or- http://goo.gl/z5zHY -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my address to write to me directly)
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 21:25:35 -0800 From: John David Galt <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: hazard mitigation, was Disruptions: The Real Hazards of E-Devices on Planes Message-ID: <email@example.com> >>> * They wish that terrorists will confine their attention to our air >>> transport industry, and not bother the millions of gallons of poison >>> gas - excuse me, I meant water treatment chemicals - that moves by >>> rail through our major cities on a daily basis. >> Actually... there's a huge amount of retrofitting and changes >> in high risk industries in general, and in water treatment >> plants in particular. Specifically because of post 9/11 concerns. It seems to me it would make good sense to reroute rail lines around major cities generally, especially now that most passenger service has gone away. > I'm sorry to say that the destructive potential is actually greater: > it's not our lives that terrorists want to end, but our life*style*. A > leak or spill of a less dangerous chemical is more disruptive than one > of chlorine gas, for several reasons: > > 1. There's only one procedure in place for chemical spills, and only > one option when they occur: evacuation and containment. It doesn't > matter if there "should" be a lower response level for a "less > dangerous" chemical: as a practical matter, the first-responders > must be trained to deal with each event in the same way. Maybe that's the only thing the first-responders do (which is understandable, since a small spill/leak/fire can easily become a large one before they get there). But the specifics of the chemical and its concentration make a big difference to what people in the area need to do immediately, and to what is likely to happen to people who are caught by surprise. By the time the radio or CD sirens tell the public what's going on, most of the deaths or injuries, if any, that are going to happen have already happened or at least can't be prevented. A few years ago I was a truck driver. The scariest thing that ever happened to me was when I made a pickup at a paper mill: when I drove up to the gate, the guard handed me goggles and a respirator mask, and said "if that siren goes off, you better put these on quick!" Understand, I wasn't scared for myself as much as for the public. The mill was in a suburb of a major city, and if they had to provide ME with safety equipment for a two hour visit, then why the bleep aren't they required to provide it to everyone who lives or works within two or three miles, since those people are exposed to that same danger every single day? It boggles the mind. BTW: I agree with your main point that most danger-hype is just theater, and the TSA in particular should be abolished. But not all dangers are imaginary and not all precautions are worth less than they cost. This is where science, properly used and not slanted by people with axes to grind, could really help but is prevented from doing so by the government hype machine.
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 21:03:07 -0500 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: 4 Areas Frontier Communications Investors Must Watch Message-ID: <20130109020307.GA3538@telecom.csail.mit.edu> >From the "Take your investment advice wherever you can find it" department: 4 Areas Frontier Communications Investors Must Watch By Dan Caplinger January 7, 2013 With a huge dividend yield, Frontier Communications looks extremely tempting as a dividend stock. But the shares have taken a big hit in recent years, leaving those who bought into the stock to get rich dividend payments with a better understanding of the risks involved with the company. Investors need to keep particular watch at Frontier as it seeks to compete against fellow rural specialists Windstream and CenturyLink to provide more relevant and higher-margin services. That's the thesis of my premium report on Frontier Communications, which includes the following excerpt, which names the four areas that Frontier investors should keep an eye on going forward. http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/01/07/4-areas-frontier-communications-investors-must-wat.aspx -or- http://goo.gl/EFPgz -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my address to write to me directly)
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 19:50:43 -0500 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: email@example.com. Subject: Some landlords blocking post-Sandy repairs Message-ID: <20130109005043.GA1688@telecom.csail.mit.edu> By PATRICK McGEEHAN Rewiring all of Lower Manhattan with fiber-optic cable after Hurricane Sandy would be hard enough without landlords blocking the way with their palms open. But that is what Verizon alleges some are doing. Verizon, whose copper wires under the streets of the financial district were ruined by the storm's floodwaters, complained last week that "many building owners in Lower Manhattan" had barred their doors. Some have simply refused to let the company in, but others have demanded exorbitant fees for access, the company said in a petition to state regulators. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/08/nyregion/landlords-blocking-rewiring-of-cable-after-hurricane-verizon-says.html?ref=verizoncommunicationsinc&_r=0 -or- http://goo.gl/Im4N3 -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my address to write to me directly)
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 22:17:57 -0500 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Mixed news for AT&T in Consumer Reports wireless survey Message-ID: <20130109031757.GA8573@telecom.csail.mit.edu> (I just found this while searching Google for at&t news. Sorry it's a bit out-of-date) Edward C. Baig, USA TODAY November 29, 2012 There's good news and bad news for AT&T in Consumer Reports' latest annual cellphone service ratings. First the bad: the carrier finished last among the four major U.S. cellphone providers, behind Verizon Wireless, Sprint and T-Mobile. But AT&T also had a silver lining. The company's 4G (fourth generation) wireless network performed the best, at least judging by the fact that it received fewer complaints than any of its rivals. That's notable considering more people surveyed use AT&T's 4G network with their smartphones. http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2012/11/29/att-mixed-results-consumer-reports-survey/1733287/ -or- http://goo.gl/0ZltE -- Bill Horne Moderator
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2013 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.