31 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981

Add this Digest to your personal   or  

The Telecom Digest for March 20, 2013
Volume 32 : Issue 67 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
Re: Verizon's Latest Plan For Cable Fees Could Lower Your Cable Bill -- Eventually (Neal McLain)
Verizon, Cablevision emerge as unlikely allies (Bill Horne)

====== 31 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======

Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address included herein for any reason other than responding to an article herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address owner.
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime.  - Geoffrey Welsh

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.

Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 23:26:30 -0500 From: Neal McLain <nmclain@annsgarden.com> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Re: Verizon's Latest Plan For Cable Fees Could Lower Your Cable Bill -- Eventually Message-ID: <51493A76.1070100@annsgarden.com> Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net wrote: > Verizon's Latest Plan For Cable Fees Could Lower Your Cable Bill -- Eventually > > By Alexis Kleinman > > What if, instead of paying for all of the hundreds of channels that > your cable provider offers when you sign up, you could choose exactly > which ones you want? That's definitely a dream of most cable > subscribers, riled by ever-high fees. And while Verizon isn't ready to > start offering a-la-carte channels, a new plan of theirs, reported in > The Wall Street Journal, could take us one step closer to making that > dream a reality. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/18/verizon-cable-fees_n_2901271.html Good luck with that. I worked in the retail end of CATV industry for 25 years and I've been writing about it for another dozen years since I retired. "The dream of most cable subscribers" is also the dream of many CATV retailers. Retailers are companies that sell video services to end consumers; e.g., franchised cable TV companies, non-franchised "private cable" companies, telephone companies (Verizon FiOS, AT&T U-Verse), and satellite TV companies (DirecTV and Dish Network). Programmers are companies that produce video programming and provide it to retailers. Programmers fall into three categories: - Television broadcast stations. - PEG (Public Access, Educational Access, Government Access) channels. - Non-broadcast channels. In any discussion of a-la-carte, the programmers hold the winning hand: - Broadcast station licensees have a legal right to force retailers to carry their signals on the basic tier. - Broadcast licensees have federally-mandated geographic markets ("Designated Market Area" or DMA). In any other industry, this arrangement would be called a "geographic monopoly." In the upside-down world of television broadcasting, it's called "consumer protection." - CATV franchising authorities have a legal right to force retailers to carry PEG channels on the basic tier. - Any programmer that owns non-broadcast programming and a broadcast station licensee has a legal right to force retailers to carry the non-broadcast programming on the basic tier as a condition for granting retransmission consent for the broadcast signal. As I've noted before in this space, if Verizon or any other retailer wants to offer programming a-la-carte, it has to start by getting Congress to repeal the grotesquely misnamed "Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992" and companion legislation governing satellite retailers. All that said, I have some doubt that a-la-carte would actually lower retail prices anyway. My narrative about that is at: http://theoldcatvequipmentmuseum.org/320/321/index.html Neal McLain
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 01:25:50 -0400 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: telecomdigestmoderator.remove-this@and-this-too.telecom-digest.org. Subject: Verizon, Cablevision emerge as unlikely allies Message-ID: <20130320052550.GA4366@telecom.csail.mit.edu> Verizon, Cablevision emerge as unlikely allies of cable-TV customers fed up with bundling By Cecilia Kang, Published: March 19 Cable viewers have long complained about paying ever-higher bills for hundreds of channels they don't want to watch. Now, in a twist, some cable companies are beginning to agree. Verizon and Cablevision are publicly pressing media companies that own the programming to stop pushing them to distribute unwanted channels and instead offer cable bundles based on what viewers actually watch. If successful, the efforts could lead to cheaper options for consumers and a sea-change in how the television industry has done business - and protected its profits - for more than two decades. http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/verizon-cablevision-emerge-as-unlikely-allies-of-cable-customers-fed-up-with-bundling/2013/03/19/11fe0dac-900d-11e2-9cfd-36d6c9b5d7ad_story.html -or- http://goo.gl/4CYVE -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my address to write to me directly) Sometimes I feel as cold as steel Broken like I'm never 'gonna heal - Lady Antebellum
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
Contact information: Bill Horne
Telecom Digest
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
Subscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=subscribe telecom
Unsubscribe: telecom-request@telecom-digest.org?body=unsubscribe telecom
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information: http://telecom-digest.org

Copyright (C) 2013 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.

End of The Telecom Digest (2 messages)

Return to Archives ** Older Issues