31 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for February 1, 2013
====== 31 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:13:13 -0500 From: Monty Solomon <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: EFF: Is It Illegal To Unlock a Phone? The Situation is Better - and Worse - Than You Think Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> ANUARY 28, 2013 | BY MITCH STOLTZ Is It Illegal To Unlock a Phone? The Situation is Better - and Worse - Than You Think Legal protection for people who unlock their mobile phones to use them on other networks expired last weekend. According to the claims of major U.S. wireless carriers, unlocking a phone bought after January 26 without your carrier's permission violates the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") whether the phone is under contract or not. In a way, this is not as bad as it sounds. In other ways, it's even worse. What changed? The DMCA prohibits "circumventing" digital locks that "control access" to copyrighted works like movies, music, books, games, and software. It's a fantastically overbroad law that bans a lot of legal, useful, and important activities. In what's supposed to be a safety valve, the U.S. Copyright Office and the Library of Congress have the power to create exemptions for important activities that would otherwise be banned by the DMCA. In 2012, EFF asked for - and won - exemptions for jailbreaking or rooting mobile phones to run unapproved software, and for using clips from DVDs and Internet video in noncommercial vids. Consumers Union and several smaller wireless carriers asked for an exemption for unlocking phones. The Copyright Office granted their exemption too - but sharply limited the window to just a few months. ... https://www.eff.org/is-it-illegal-to-unlock-a-phone
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:18:44 -0600 (CST) From: email@example.com (Doug McIntyre) To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: More on the Linksys sale Message-ID: <510ABC6A.email@example.com> Telecom Digest Moderator wrote: >Now, the way I read this, I think that Belkin is getting all of >Cisco's "Home"-class line, and that means the "Cisco" branded SOHO >routers. However, the stories aren't clear on that, so I'd like to >hear from anyone with better info. I don't have better info, just my impression of Cisco's product offerings using and reselling them for 20 years. Unlike the vast majority of Cisco's purchases, where they tended to wrap the technology they wanted pretty intrinsicly into their main product offerings, Cisco always kept the "Linksys" brand very distinct and even the brand name "Linksys" was almost always utilized (with a few exceptions wavering back and forth in the middle). I think if you visit http://home.cisco.com/ , you'll find what Cisco considers it's Linksys product line. For the most part, there was very little crossover into the next line up, their SMB products. You could consider something like the "SRP500" line to be a Linksys/Cisco hybrid, Or the "RV" VPN router line, so it'd be a toss up about those. The Cisco 100/200/300/500 switches could also be a tossup. But I think that certainly anything classic Cisco, such as their long running SMB/SOHO 800 series line would definately be staying with Cisco. Or any Catalyst switches, even those aimed at smaller markets. With only a couple products crossing over, I don't think there'd be much quibbling about what Cisco is keeping or ditching.
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2013 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.