32 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for October 3, 2013
====== 32 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:54:28 -0400 From: "Alan Smithee, A.S.C." <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Caller ID numbers that start with '1' Message-ID: <email@example.com> Lately, I've been having numbers show up on my cell phone's caller ID where the local exchange begins with 1. I thought 1, when it is used as the first digit in a phone number in the NANP denotes that the digits that follow are to be routed long distance. Has this changed?
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 04:10:56 +0000 (UTC) From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Garrett Wollman) To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Astros draw 0.0 Nielsen TV rating in Houston market during loss to Indians Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> In article <email@example.com>, Monty Solomon <firstname.lastname@example.org> quoted some Sports Illustrated webicle which said: >According to the Houston Chronicle's David Barron, Sunday's game, >which started at noon Central Time (1 p.m. Eastern Time in Cleveland) >and was broadcast on Comcast SportsNet Houston, received a 0.00 >Nielsen rating - a sampling of a small percentage of the TV-watching >population. Sunday's rating came via 581 meters in the Greater >Houston area, around half of which were in use by viewers for any >15-minute period [...] And the margin of sampling error for n = 581 is...? (Not that I expect a sports reporter to even know what that means.) If I recall correctly, it should be somewhere around 4.5%. So what this really says is that there is a 95% probability that fewer than 4.5% of Houston-area television households were watching the game. But that's not nearly as exciting a claim. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | What intellectual phenomenon can be older, or more oft email@example.com| repeated, than the story of a large research program Opinions not shared by| that impaled itself upon a false central assumption my employers. | accepted by all practitioners? - S.J. Gould, 1993
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 06:36:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Joseph Singer <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Any way around Verizon blocking Page Plus on Verizon prepaid phones? Message-ID: <1380721010.83647.YahooMailNeo@web121403.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:03:23 -0700 (PDT) firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > A few years ago when I first started using a prepay cel phone you > could use Page Plus on any Verizon phone. > Apparently things have changed which I discovered when I went to get > a newer phone. Now you can't use a Verizon prepay phone with any > plan other than a Verizon plan. > Or can you? Is there any hack or workaround? It seems the only > alternatives are to pay the insane price for a contract phone > without getting a contract or finding an older used Verizon phone. Unfortunately CDMA operators (such as Verizon and Sprint) have ultimate say on which devices can be attached to their networks. Since CDMA handsets are activated by the MEID (formerly by ESN or electronic serial number) they can block any range of numbers on devices that they like. I'm guessing that the more recent devices' MEID's are somehow flagged so Verizon will not activate these devices even if the device was used previously on Verizon.
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2013 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.