31 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for June 30, 2013
====== 31 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 04:16:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Neal McLain <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: It's vacation time again Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> On Friday, June 28, 2013 3:45:52 PM UTC-5, Thad Floryan wrote: > D'oh! Headslap and facepalm -- I didn't know comp.dcom.telecom > was also being distributed via a mailing list. > Learn something new every day! :-) T-D is also available as a Google Group. If you have a Google account attached to the same email address that you use for T-D, log in to Google with that address. From the Google home page, click More -> Even more -> Groups -> My Groups, and you should see a link to T-D. You can read every one of 68,960 messages currently in the archive, search by name or topic, comment on any message, or start a new topic. You can also discover other interesting factoids, such as the Most Active Posters of all time: Monty Solomon, Lisa Hancock, and John Levine. Neal McLain ***** Moderator's Note ***** What Neal is pointing out is that Google will, with some prodding, let its users see the Usenet archives. These are not, however, "Google" groups: I reserved a group for the digest some time ago, but it's not in use. It's just a placeholder, to keep the name. Bill Horne Moderator
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 19:47:06 -0400 From: tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Walmart cellphone plans? Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> On 27 Jun 2013 00:14:54 -0400, Brian Gordon wrote: > So the plethora of Walmart ads say you can keep your phone(s) and number(s) and > switch to their off-brand carriers for the same networks and a lot less money. > > Anyone try that? Experiences? Is one better than others? We use cellphones as > phones, with a little texting, nothing exotic. Sprint prices aren't that > great. Any recommendations? Another "off-brand carrier" (actually, MVNO) is Page Plus Cellular, https://www.pagepluscellular.com/ , through whom you can get service for many (if not all) Verizon handsets, at tariffs ranging from $10 every 120 days (rolling over if renewed by day 120), good for about 80 minutes, to plans for really heavy users (like unlimited calling, unlimited texting, and 5GB data for ~$70/month). Mexico's Carlos Slim is said to be buying them out, but their web site seems virtually unchanged ... . Walmart doesn't sell Page Plus refills, AFAICT; but an outfit called Calling Mart does, often at 5% off: https://www.callingmart.com/ . Cheers, -- tlvp (a satisfied, el cheapo, PP/CM customer) -- Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 15:01:10 -0400 From: T <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: Access Recovery Charge Message-ID: <MPG.email@example.com> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com says... > > Having just received a bill in which CenturyLink (motto: "proving > Qwest wasn't so bad after all") raises my Access Recovery Charge, I > started to wonder. The bill says the charges are "to recover costs > of providing access to the telephone network". Since I do not receive > any telephone service from CenturyLink (only DSL, a non-regulated > service), or the "telephone network" (aside from the copper from my > house back to the pedestal 2 blocks away) should I be subject to this > charge? > > Google finds FCC filings and rulings regarding the Access Recovery > Charge, so is this actually a federally regulated thing (and not just > another BS "extra charge for being alive")? And if so, should I be > charged it, since I'm not using the switched telephone network? Like most of the fees and other 'taxes' on our phone bills this is just a money grab by the incumbent telco. It's why I ditched even Vonage - they were getting ridiculous on the fees. And I'm still getting email from them asking me to come back. Yeah, right.
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2013 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.