31 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for June 13, 2013
====== 31 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:10:06 -0500 From: email@example.com (PV) To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: Credibility Crunch for Tech Companies Over Prism Message-ID: <QJOdnVcE5pkTWiXMnZ2dnUVZ_h6dnZ2d@supernews.com> Thad Floryan <email@example.com> writes: >Everything is now being stored at the NSA's Utah facility which has >a yottabyte capacity (1 trillion terabytes or 1 quadrillion gigabytes) Um, a yottabyte is a quadrillion terabytes - you're off by 3 orders of magnitude. I know people have thrown around the idea of the Utah facility being yottabyte class storage, but that's about the technology they're using (such as ZFS as you mentioned), not what they actually have. A yottabyte is a couple hundred times larger than the entire estimated size of the internet. There is no present technology that could pack that much data into their datacenter and still access it. A solid block of micro-SD cards with the cases removed wouldn't fit. * -- * PV Something like badgers, something like lizards, and something like corkscrews.
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:27:55 -0700 From: Thad Floryan <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Credibility Crunch for Tech Companies Over Prism Message-ID: <51B8F5EB.firstname.lastname@example.org> On 6/12/2013 12:10 PM, PV wrote: > Thad Floryan <email@example.com> writes: >> Everything is now being stored at the NSA's Utah facility which has >> a yottabyte capacity (1 trillion terabytes or 1 quadrillion gigabytes) > > Um, a yottabyte is a quadrillion terabytes - you're off by 3 orders > of magnitude. Oops, you're right. Thank you for the catch -- a second set of eyes is always helpful! :-) Using this URL as a reference and doubly-checked elsewhere: http://highscalability.com/blog/2012/9/11/how-big-is-a-petabyte-exabyte-zettabyte-or-a-yottabyte.html I created the following table (with a printed copy on the wall beside my desk) that others may find useful, too. A fixed-width font should be used to view or print this: Byte (8 bits): 1 byte Kilobyte: 1,000 bytes Megabyte: 1,000,000 bytes Gigabyte: 1,000,000,000 bytes Terabyte: 1,000,000,000,000 bytes Petabyte: 1,000,000,000,000,000 bytes Exabyte: 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 bytes Zettabyte: 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 bytes Yottabyte: 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 bytes Xenottabyte: 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 bytes Shilentnobyte: 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 bytes Domegemegrottebyte: 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 bytes > I know people have thrown around the idea of the Utah facility being > yottabyte class storage, but that's about the technology they're using > (such as ZFS as you mentioned), not what they actually have. A yottabyte > is a couple hundred times larger than the entire estimated size of the > internet. There is no present technology that could pack that much data > into their datacenter and still access it. A solid block of micro-SD > cards with the cases removed wouldn't fit. * Further checking reveals these ZFS limits confirmed by multiple sources: Max. file size: 2^64 bytes (16 Exabytes) Max. number of files: 2^48 Max. filename length: 255 bytes Max. volume size: 2^64 bytes (16 Exabytes) I'm sending email to the sources from which I found incorrect information; thank you again for your reply. Thad
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 20:41:59 -0400 From: T <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Price-gouging cable companies are our latter-day robber barons Message-ID: <MPG.firstname.lastname@example.org> In article <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org says... > > Price-gouging cable companies are our latter-day robber barons > > Monopolistic cable providers make internet access an unaffordable > luxury for tens of millions of Americans > > Heidi Moore > guardian.co.uk > 4 June 2013 > > Last year, about 1% of American households cut off their internet > service. That's not as surprising as experts may suggest. > > The internet - which promised to connect all Americans with > everything from educational opportunities to Facebook status updates > - has become, unfortunately, a luxury even for the middle class. > Cable companies that have functioned as oligopolies have made it that > way. > > [Moderator snip] > > Yet, strangely, internet access - which is a necessity in homes where > children get their homework online and parents may telecommute - has > become the splashiest purchase of all. In many big cities, internet > access can easily become a budgetary sinkhole for families. Think of > $100 a month for cable and internet, another $50 a month for a > smartphone, $40 a month for an iPad or a similar device; if you > travel, add $70 a month for some kind of wireless hotspot like > Verizon's Mi-Fi. > > ... > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jun/04/price-gouging-cable-companies > If you read Susan Crawford's "Captive Audicence" you'll see she lays out what it really costs the providers to provide the service. For net service it's not ever 3% of what they charge you. So they could essentially charge you $10 a month for good net service and still make a profit. And I'm hoping Google eventually wires up the entire U.S. It would put a shot across the bow of the likes of Verizon, at&t, Cox, Comcast et al. I mean, you've got options with Google like pay a $300 construction charge and get 3mbps/1mpbs service in perpetuity. Or pay for higher bandwidth. But it would FORCE in my case Verizon and Cox to play nicely.
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2013 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.