31 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for June 12, 2013
====== 31 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 21:26:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Neal McLain <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Price-gouging cable companies are our latter-day robber barons Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> RE: Price-gouging cable companies are our latter-day robber barons > ... They rationalize it like this: even though the cable > companies have a gross profit margin of around 97% - meaning > 97 cents of every dollar they make is pure profit - they still > have to pay to service cell towers and invest in broadband. > They have expensive equipment to maintain, see? That's not > monopoly pricing power. That's just basic subsistence. Service cell towers? 97% profit? Wow ... the industry sure has changed since I was a cable guy! If a cable company is indeed making 97% profit, that implies that the other 3% covers all other costs. Little things as payroll, employee benefits, programming fees, retransmission-consent fees, internet connection charges, administrative overhead, advertising, customer care, customer billing, maintenance, public relations, government relations, insurance, legal services, rent and lease expense, utilities, vehicle expense, franchise acquisition and compliance, franchise fees, copyright royalties, FCC registration and compliance, operation and maintenance of video-signal reception and processing facilities ("headend"), operation and maintenance of cable modem termination system, distribution and maintenance of video converters, distribution and maintenance of cable modems, outdoor distribution facilities ("outside plant") extending from the headend to every customer's premises, utility-pole attachment fees ("pole rental") for aerial outside plant, contractor-hotline ("one-call") notification services for underground outside plant, verification of the technical integrity of internal wiring inside customer premises (even though the company may not own it), access control (accurately connecting each subscriber), detecting and prosecuting unauthorized connections. And yes, "servicing cell towers." Many cable companies rent tower space to PCS carriers, so obviously they have to maintain them. But does the writer actually believe that cable companies use cell towers to distribute their signals? Neal McLain Retired Cable Guy
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 03:22:35 -0700 From: Thad Floryan <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: Credibility Crunch for Tech Companies Over Prism Message-ID: <51B6FA6B.email@example.com> On 6/9/2013 11:52 AM, Monty Solomon wrote:> [...] > The executives said Google only hands over data based on > legally-authorized requests that it reviews individually. > > U.S. officials briefed on the matter said Friday that the NSA > receives copies of data through a system they set up with a court > order. They don't have direct access to the company computers, those > people said. > [...] Has everyone already forgotten NSA's Echelon and the Russian's SORM? I believe we've had a thread on this before in comp.dcom.telecom in which I posted numerous relevant URLs since I maintain a personal archive regarding Echelon and SORM because it interests me. Regarding the above's "They don't have direct access to the company computers", that's very true because they don't need direct access. Why? Because the NSA taps all Internet backbones worldwide along with all radio and telephone traffic worldwide, so anything going to/from Google and all other ISPs and providers and anyone else is already intercepted using fiber prisms on ALL fiber backbones everywhere on Earth, and that's "just" Echelon. Russia's SORM-IV is similar. As I posted previously, here's an article about the NSA tap on AT&T's US West coast fiber backbone (and there are many more such articles) with this one from the San Francisco Chronicle dated November 7, 2007: http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Former-AT-amp-T-worker-details-federal-Internet-3237018.php The NSA all-world-backbone taps are again confirmed in this article dated May 4, 2013: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/04/telephone-calls-recorded-fbi-boston Everything is now being stored at the NSA's Utah facility which has a yottabyte capacity (1 trillion terabytes or 1 quadrillion gigabytes) which is why they needed the ZFS filesystem being developed at the DoD's Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories (LLNL); info here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZFS and http://zfsonlinux.org and this one as an "only" 50 petabytes test bed: http://zfsonlinux.org/llnl-zfs-lustre.html Info about the NSA Utah data center is here: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_Data_Center http://www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2012/03/20/nsas-secret-data-center-is-a-threat-but-only-to-americas-enemies/ Thad ***** Moderator's Note ***** It's nice to know that when Big Brother tells me to face the Telescreen, I'll be able to answer "Which one"? Bill Horne Moderator
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2013 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.