31 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for January 11, 2013
====== 31 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:14:11 -0800 From: SMS <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: Mixed news for AT&T in Consumer Reports wireless survey Message-ID: <email@example.com> On 1/8/2013 7:17 PM, Bill Horne wrote: <snip> > > http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2012/11/29/att-mixed-results-consumer-reports-survey/1733287/ > > -or- > > http://goo.gl/0ZltE > What is rather strange about the Consumer Reports article is that Consumer Cellular, an MVNO that uses AT&T, ranked very highly in areas where AT&T itself ranked poorly. Perhaps the Consumer Cellular customers have very low expectations of network quality, or perhaps AT&T customers just like to complain a lot. Furthermore, Consumer Cellular is one of the most expensive MVNOs, far more expensive than Verizon MVNO Page Plus Cellular, yet it's presented as a low cost option.
Date: 11 Jan 2013 01:55:02 -0000 From: "John Levine" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Mixed news for AT&T in Consumer Reports wireless survey Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> >Perhaps the Consumer Cellular customers have very low expectations of >network quality, or perhaps AT&T customers just like to complain a lot. They probably do different things. I have a Tracfone that runs on AT&T's network, and I think it works great. That's likely because I make voice calls and SMS, no data. Looks like Consumer Cellular is the same idea.
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 22:25:00 -0500 From: T <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: hazard mitigation, was Disruptions: The Real Hazards of E-Devices on Planes Message-ID: <MPG.email@example.com> In article <i7WdnQKst5n2DXDNnZ2dnUVZ_sWdnZ2d@posted.nuvoxcommunications>, firstname.lastname@example.org says... > > In article <email@example.com>, > John David Galt <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > >>>> * They wish that terrorists will confine their attention to our air > >>>> transport industry, and not bother the millions of gallons of poison > >>>> gas - excuse me, I meant water treatment chemicals - that moves by > >>>> rail through our major cities on a daily basis. > > > >>> Actually... there's a huge amount of retrofitting and changes > >>> in high risk industries in general, and in water treatment > >>> plants in particular. Specifically because of post 9/11 concerns. > > > >It seems to me it would make good sense to reroute rail lines around major > >cities generally, especially now that most passenger service has gone away. > > It makes the best sense to have the rail lines deliver products as close > as possible to the destination. The accident rate 'per ton-mile' on > hazmat loads is far lower for rail than any other mode of land transport. > > That aside, the costs for relocating all freight rail service outside of > "major cities" would be incredibly expensive -- laying track, signaling, > etc., is millions per mile, exclusive of land costs. not to mention the > switchyards, terminal facilities for loading/unloading 'piggyback' trailers, > etc. and the highway infrastructure to get stuff from the new yards to > the destination, and the numbers get really big in short order. > > And, what do you do on the East Coast, where it's all built-up territory? > > Where's all the money to pay for this going to come from? Here in RI passenger sitll uses the rail. The line runs nearby to me and friends of ours in East Greenwich live right next to the tracks.
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2013 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.