30 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for March 19, 2012
====== 30 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 13:01:16 -0400 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: email@example.com. Subject: Should private ambulance companies have access to blocked CPN? Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> The FCC is considering a petition for waiver of its rules regarding the delivery of Calling Party Number to a volunteer ambulance company. The idea, which appears to be back on the front burner at the FCC after years of debate, is covered in FCC proceeding number 91-281. In brief: a private non-profit corporation which provides ambulance services has asked that it be allowed to see Caller ID information that the Calling Party has blocked. The company's argument(1) is that it deserves the same consideration as a Public Safety Access Point (PSAP), since it is providing emergency response in situations where lives are at stake. I feel that the request should be denied. There are valid arguments both for and against, but I'm uncomfortable with the idea of granting governmental powers or privileges to non-public corporations, no matter how well-intentioned their request may be. CenturyLink's comment(2) is the most recent (3/16/2012), and one sentence caught my eye: Contrary to the Petition's assertions, though, it is not obvious that the needs of private emergency services providers are the same as those associated with public agencies, agencies generally charged by legislative or government imperatives to protect the public health and safety. ... and I agree. After all, there are numerous private ambulance service providers, who are licensed to offer their services to the public, and which are answerable to the government for their competence, training programs, and performance. However, they are dispatched through PSAPs, which keep records to prevent abuses. Here's the official filing: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=6016985878 -or- http://goo.gl/jTJMS The FCC proceeding 91-281, which is the official request for public comment, is at: http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2012/db0214/DA-12-210A1.pdf -or- http://goo.gl/VGacr The comments to the proceeding are at http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/proceeding/view?z=rdmfz&name=91-281 -or- http://goo.gl/x2esJ Bill P.S. Full disclosue: I was responsible for the E911 system in New England during part of my career at Verizon. I was also once a CenturyLink employee. 1. Other organizations have asked that they be given the same waiver: most notably, NASA, on behalf of the security forces at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida. 2. The rest of CenturyLink's filing is at http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=6017025180 -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my address to write to me directly) (Robert Bonomi served as guest moderator for this post)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 00:53:46 -0400 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: email@example.com. Subject: CWA plans 'Day of Action' against Verizon Message-ID: <20120319045346.GA21594@telecom.csail.mit.edu> The Communications Workers of America is planning a "Day of Action" against Verizon, which will be March 22. The CWA website has the announcement: There's still time to find an event in your community and join in the National Day of Action, that hits "1 percent" Verizon for its corporate greed, and brings union and progressive activists together to stand up for each other's fights on March 22. Go to www.stopverizongreed.com to find an event or post information about what your local has planned. Across AFL-CIO unions, across the labor movement, with support from Jobs with Justice and lots of progressive groups, activists are joining together on March 22. Rest is at: http://www.cwa-union.org/news/entry/are_you_ready_for_march_22 -or- http://goo.gl/GK4xH Bill -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my address to email me directly)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:08:39 -0400 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: IBEW calls for 'March and Rally to Stop Corporate Greed' Message-ID: <20120319050839.GA23329@telecom.csail.mit.edu> IBEW calls for "March and Rally to Stop Corporate Greed". This is the latest news on the March 22 demonstrations that both the IBEW and the CWA are organizing. This is from the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 2222 site: Verizon has made tens of billions in profits and its top executives walked away with $283 million in the last four years. But when it comes to the 45,000 workers who make Verizon's success possible, suddenly the company cries broke. Verizon has sent thousands of American jobs overseas, and wants to outsource even more jobs, gut pensions, charge current and retired employees thousands of dollars more for health benefits, and cut disability benefits for workers injured doing their jobs. Details at: http://ibew2222.org/ -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my address to write to me directly)
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:00:32 -0400 From: Bill Horne <bill@horneQRM.net> To: email@example.com. Subject: CWA Bargaining continues with AT&T Message-ID: <20120319050032.GA21914@telecom.csail.mit.edu> Bargaining for Four AT&T Contracts Continues CWA bargaining teams are continuing separate negotiations with AT&T Midwest, AT&T West, AT&T Legacy and AT&T East. CWA negotiators are reporting tough bargaining at every table and are urging members to keep mobilizing to make certain that the companies know we're not backing down from our fair contract fight. Those contracts expire April 7. In the summer, CWA District 3 will begin negotiations with AT&T Southeast; that contract expires in early August. http://www.cwa-union.org/news/entry/bargaining_for_four_att_contracts_continues -or- http://tinyurl.com/6p6g5z6 -- Bill Horne (Remove QRM from my address to write to me directly)
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2012 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.