31 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for August 28, 2012
====== 31 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: 26 Aug 2012 18:36:38 -0000 From: "John Levine" <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: Jury Awards $1 Billion to Apple in Samsung Patent Case Message-ID: <email@example.com> >What I found most surprising about this case is that these companies >don't have cross-licensing arrangements. I thought that was how most >big companies, each having extensive portfolios of patents, avoided >zillions of patent-infringement cases among themselves. Cross-licensing is indeed common, but it's also common to hold back patents that a company thinks are particularly important. >Didn't Samsung also counter-sue Apple over patents on the wireless >technology? Are we still waiting for the verdict on that? No, the jury ruled against Samsung on all of them. *Moderator Note: per another submission, Samsung did sue Apple in S. Korea, and, in -that- case, it was held that Apple did infringe on Samsung patents, and that Samsung did not copy Apple's "look and feel". According to the other reportage, the S. Korea ruling came down 'a couple of days' before the U.S. verdict.
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 15:45:18 +0000 (UTC) From: danny burstein <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Jury Awards $1 Billion to Apple in Samsung Patent Case Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> In <barmar-DC8322.email@example.com> Barry Margolin <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: [snippeth] >> That is not a big financial blow to Samsung, one of the world's >> largest electronics companies. But the decision could essentially >> force it and other smartphone makers to redesign their products to be >> less Apple-like, or risk further legal defeats. >Or just pay licensing fees to Apple. >What I found most surprising about this case is that these companies >don't have cross-licensing arrangements. I thought that was how most >big companies, each having extensive portfolios of patents, avoided >zillions of patent-infringement cases among themselves. >Didn't Samsung also counter-sue Apple over patents on the wireless >technology? Are we still waiting for the verdict on that? Samsung had a similar lawsuit going on in... South Korea. And curiously enough, that decision came out a couple of days prior to the one here in the US. Oh, and that decision mostly favored Samsung. [USA Today] South Korea's Samsung won a home court ruling in its global smartphone battle against Apple on Friday when judges in Seoul said the company didn't copy the look and feel of the U.S. company's iPhone, and that Apple infringed on Samsung's wireless technology. http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/story/2012-08-23/apple-samsung-lawsuit/57260602/1 danny "lots of lawyers will get plenty rich here" burstein -- _____________________________________________________ Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key email@example.com [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:21:16 -0500 From: Monty Solomon <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Study says drivers, not cellphones, pose the accident risk Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cellphones' role in crashes doubted Study says drivers, not cellphones, pose the accident risk By Hiawatha Bray | GLOBE STAFF AUGUST 27, 2012 Don't blame the technology. For those who argue that a ban on cellphone use while driving will make highways safer, there's bad news: People who chat behind the wheel often drive more aggressively even after they hang up, according to a study from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, "The people who are more willing to frequently engage in cellphone use are higher-risk drivers, independent of the phone," said Bryan Reimer, associate director of MIT's New England University Transportation Center. "It's not just a subtle difference with those willing to pick up the phone. This is a big difference." Reimer and a team of MIT researchers studied the behavior of 108 Greater Boston drivers. About half acknowledged frequent phone use when driving; the rest said they rarely used their phones behind the wheel. ... http://bostonglobe.com/business/2012/08/26/not-cellphone-but-driver-that-high-risk-not-cellphone-but-driver-that-high-risk/nVKDgqQTnn91287ZZ30v7N/story.html?s_campaign=8315
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2012 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.