30 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for July 28, 2012
====== 30 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:41:43 -0400 From: T <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Challenge-Response Message-ID: <MPG.firstname.lastname@example.org> In article <email@example.com>, PeteCress@invalid.telecom-digest.org says... > > I have been ranting about challenge-response periodically for a > couple of years now. > > "Captcha" for phones, so-to-speak. > > Does anybody else think that's where phone service is headed > globally? > > I'm thinking that a standard part of phone service (like the > ubiquitous answering-machine functionality) will be a means to > implement challenge-response. > > A couple of examples where the phone doesn't even ring until the > challenge has been met: > > - A message that says "Press 1 for Joe, press 2 for Sam, press 3 > for Sue...... where the right number to press is buried somewhere > in there and pressing anything else disconnects the call. > > - A message that says something like "Please the number of > fingers on a human hand" and anything but 5 disconnects. > > > These could be implemented so that frequent callers can just > press the right number as soon as the challenger picks up so they > are minimally inconvenienced. > > > I'm still looking for reasons whey the world isn't headed in this > direction... > > > ?? It's not going to happen. Most phone services allow call-block now. And on my phone I use Blacklist for Android - MetroPCS wants to charge me a buck a month for phone block. A $2 app does it forever and I don't need to pay MetroPCS for the privilege.
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 10:11:31 -0400 From: Monty Solomon <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Sprint Nextel Reports Second Quarter 2012 Results and Updates Full Year Forecast Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> 26 July 2012 Sprint Nextel Reports Second Quarter 2012 Results and Updates Full Year Forecast Best ever Sprint platform postpaid ARPU of $63.38 drives Sprint platform wireless service revenue growth of 16 percent year-over-year Best ever Sprint platform postpaid churn of 1.69 percent Continued strong iPhone sales of nearly 1.5 million - 40 percent to new postpaid customers Network Vision deployment continues on track Launched 4G LTE in five major markets and 15 cities on July 15 Continue to expect 12,000 sites on air by the end of 2012 Shutdown of 9,600 Nextel sites now complete 60 percent of postpaid subscribers leaving Nextel platform recaptured on Sprint platform Operating loss of $629 million; Adjusted OIBDA* of $1.45 billion increases 10 percent year-over-year and includes Network Vision and iPhone dilution Year-over-year increase in Adjusted OIBDA* is the highest in more than five years Sequential quarterly increase in Adjusted OIBDA* of 20 percent 2012 Adjusted OIBDA* forecast increased to between $4.5 billion and $4.6 billion ... http://newsroom.sprint.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=2340
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:44:04 -0400 From: T <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: Caller-ID says McGraw-Hill, voice says "Best Help"? Message-ID: <MPG.email@example.com> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com says... > > On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:44:33 -0400, tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> > wrote in comp.dcom.telecom: > > >Curiosity made me answer a phone call this morning that Caller-ID showed as > >coming from an area 212 (NYC) number identified by name as McGraw Hill Com. > > > >A female voice at the other end, speaking an intelligible but oddly > >accented English, asked for me by name, and then said "This is 'Best Help', > >it's a call about your computer, OK?" > > > >My response? "No; not OK; thanks; bye." And I hung up. McGraw Hill, indeed! > > > >This business of impersonating legitimate and well-known organizations by > >sending counterfeit Caller-ID data has got to stop. Are not the local loop > >providers somehow "accessories after the fact" to that fraud? > > > >Cheers, -- tlvp > > We got a 000-000-0000 call that the caller claimed happened because he > was on VOIP. Does that make sense? AFAIK the VOIP services include > Caller-ID. The caller still refused to identify his organization after > being asked to do so. > > On a similar note, if the whole point of ANI was to pass along the > number to the person paying for the call, shouldn't ANI be passed for > all calls to cell phones? I note Skype used to send 000-000-0000, now it send 012-345-6789 on occasion.
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:44:55 -0400 From: T <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Heathkit Declares Bankruptcy, Closes for Good (Again) Message-ID: <MPG.firstname.lastname@example.org> In article <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org says... > > Heathkit Declares Bankruptcy, Closes for Good (Again) > > 07/24/2012 > > The July 19 edition of The Herald-Palladium -- a newspaper serving > the communities of Benton Harbor and St Joseph, Michigan -- is > reporting that Heathkit Education Company has declared bankruptcy and > has officially closed its doors after defaulting on its lease. > According to the paper, Heathkit employed more than 1800 people in > its heyday after World War II; when it finally closed, its workforce > totaled fewer than six people. This is the second time since 1992 > that Heathkit Educational Services has shuttered its doors. In August > 2011, Heathkit announced it was returning to the kit building > business, and in September, that it would once again be manufacturing > Amateur Radio kits. > > ... > > > http://www.arrl.org/news/view/heathkit-declares-bankruptcy-closes-for-good-again > I find it odd that they couldn't make a go of it when companies like Sparkfun and even MPJA are doing a bang up job of it.
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2012 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.