30 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for July 13, 2012
====== 30 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using any name or email address
included herein for any reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to that person, or email address
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without the explicit written consent of the owner of that address. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: 12 Jul 2012 02:17:52 -0000 From: "John Levine" <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Looking for a new RespOrg for my personal 888 number Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> I've been happy with Pioneer Tel: http://pioneertelephone.com/ 800 numbers are 99c/mo and about 3c/min. If you get your bill by email there's no monthly minimum. Their rates for dial-1 service are pretty good, too. R's, John
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 23:26:33 -0400 From: Monty Solomon <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: The Phone That Wasn't There: 11 Things You Need to Know About Phantom Vibrations Message-ID: <email@example.com> The Phone That Wasn't There: 11 Things You Need to Know About Phantom Vibrations Robinson Meyer The Atlantic JULY 10 2012 No, "Phantom Vibrations" are not a terrible "Beach Boys Meet the Munsters Cover Tribute Band." You're sitting at work. Your phone vibrates in your pocket. As you reach for it, you look up... and see your phone, sitting on the table. You just experienced a phantom vibration. A new study was released this week on the phenomenon. Led by IU-PU Fort Wayne's Michelle Drouin, it was published in the journal of Computers in Human Behavior. It's only the third study on this new phenomenon of the mobile age, so we can fairly say that these are the eleven things we know about phantom vibrations: ... http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/the-phone-that-wasnt-there-11-things-you-need-to-know-about-phantom-vibrations/259638/
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 00:51:45 -0400 From: Monty Solomon <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: What You Need To Know About The Latest Twitter Privacy Ruling Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> What You Need To Know About The Latest Twitter Privacy Ruling By Adam Cohen July 9, 2012 Twitter, Facebook and other social media outlets have a great deal of information about all of us - and the government wants to be able to see it. Last week, the government scored a major win - and Internet privacy lost big - when a judge ruled against Twitter in a fight over a trove of information about a political activist. New York prosecutors asked Twitter to hand over tweets that Malcolm Harris, an Occupy Wall Street protester, sent over a three-and-a-half month period. It might not seem like a privacy invasion to read people's tweets, but the government's request included other kinds of information that Twitter has about Harris, which could include private communications and records of his physical whereabouts. This is just the sort of stuff we should be worried about the government getting easy access to, and just the sort of precedent that should worry anyone who uses social media. ... http://ideas.time.com/2012/07/09/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-latest-twitter-privacy-ruling/ http://www.law.yale.edu/news/15785.htm
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 02:28:06 +0000 (UTC) From: email@example.com (Garrett Wollman) To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Anyone else get locked out of Twitter? Message-ID: <email@example.com> I've been using Twitter for a few months now, mainly as a way to keep up with friends and a few bloggers who post pointers to their new posts. I think I'm a pretty normal user in all respects but one: While I primarily use the company's officially-supported client for Android, I rarely use the browser-based user interface at all, and I use Cameron Kaiser's excellent "ttytter" Perl script from the command line (both to send and also as a background job with updates scrolling by in a separate window). I'm certainly not a spammer or a pornographer, and my password is a long string of pseudorandom characters and thus extremely unlikely to be guessed by an attacker. On Sunday evening, both of these clients mysteriously started reporting "authentication failure", with no explanation. After restarting, reentering my password a few times, and similar measures, I opened up the browser interface, logged in there, and it told me that my account was "suspended". No reason was given, and following their official support links ultimately sends an email which says, in effect, "if you don't reply to this message, we will close your support request without looking at it". So I replied, and have done so faithfully for the past four days, without receiving any sort of feedback at all from the company in general or the helpdesk in particular. Has anyone else had a similar experience? What did the problem turn out to be? I have a theory that the account blocking is done automatically, without human intervention, by some sort of machine-learning system, so it may be that there simply is no meaningful "reason" to offer other than "the classifier said so". (This is often the case with machine-learning systems; the "reason" is a complex and non-human-interpretable function of the system's internal state structure.) -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | What intellectual phenomenon can be older, or more oft firstname.lastname@example.org| repeated, than the story of a large research program Opinions not shared by| that impaled itself upon a false central assumption my employers. | accepted by all practitioners? - S.J. Gould, 1993
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2012 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.