29 Years of the Digest ... founded August 21, 1981
The Telecom Digest for August 02, 2011
====== 29 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Bill Horne and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be sold or given away without explicit written consent. Chain letters, viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands against crime. - Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 20:33:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Joseph Singer <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com. Subject: Re: Wider-range cordless phones? Message-ID: <1312169588.81289.YahooMailClassic@web161509.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Sat, 30 Jul 2011 11:28:42 -0700 AES <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > Can anyone suggest any particularly good extended-coverage cordless > phone models for this purpose? Single line models are all we really > need, though a dual or even quad-line model could be of some use. > Models where you can exert a fair amount of control over the base > station from the cordless handset keyboards would be handy. Consider getting a DECT (used to stand for Digital European Cordless Telephone but now stands for Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications) type phone see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DECT
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 20:13:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "Adam H. Kerman" <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: Wider-range cordless phones? Message-ID: <email@example.com> Rich Greenberg <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: >Before I married, I always had a phone in the primary bathroom, within >reach of the throne. Only used occasionally, but glad to have it then. >Currently, my wife has asked me not to install one there. Your wife doesn't understand. When you're in the bathroom, somehow, the people who are difficult to get hold of who won't leave complete messages in voice mail or email just know that's when to call with important information that you need that you aren't in position to act on nor take notes. If you have a phone in there with you, it defeats them. You want the phone in there so it never rings when you use the terlet.
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 22:31:03 -0400 From: Tom Horne <email@example.com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org. Subject: Re: L.A. County starting over on emergency communications system Message-ID: <4E34BE67.email@example.com> Some of the readers may wonder how a big company like Raytheon was brought up short at the last moment: carefully read the last part of this LA Times article and you have the answer. The pending deal with Raytheon has been roiled by allegations of impropriety for months. Motorola Co., which also bid on the project, filed a formal protest over the way in which the two companies' proposals were evaluated. Company executives again vigorously protested when a member of the county's negotiation team gave Raytheon staffers classified technical information from Motorola's proposal. Motorola threatened legal action if the deal with Raytheon went through. Because the board's deliberations were made in private, it was not immediately clear how much, if at all, the prospect of a protracted legal battle played into the decision by the project board to walk away from contract talks. Motorola officials declined to be interviewed, but made clear they plan to compete with Raytheon once again for the project. "We support the Board's action today and look forward to responding to their revised solicitation as soon as it is released," the company said in a prepared statement. Copyright © 2011, Los Angeles Times http://www.latimes.com/ I think that about say's it all. Motorola is the undisputed king of hardball in large contract awards. Raytheon undoubtedly was working as an "Integrator", rather than taking a "Sole Contractor" approach. As far as I know, Raytheon is not in the mobile radio business directly. It is absolutely critical to the Motorola business model to get these large contracts as a sole source provider so that after the competitive process is over they have successfully wedded the buyer to Motorola as the only practical source for expansions, replacements, and spares. When Motorola is not the original provider they have no practical way to charge five thousand dollars for each portable radio in the out years of the project. Open source, standards based systems are deadly to the Motorola business model. Think of Motorola as the Microsoft of Radio. For Microsoft, Open Office is the worst thing to ever happen in "Their" industry. Keep in mind that mantra that Microsoft first introduced us to: "Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt." And likewise "Nobody ever gets fired for specifying Microsoft - er, Motorola." -- Tom
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom- munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'. TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work and that of the original author. The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
|Contact information:||Bill Horne|
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm- unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and published continuously since then. Our archives are available for your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list on the internet in any category! URL information: http://telecom-digest.org Copyright (C) 2009 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved. Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA. --------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above. Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing your name to the mailing list. All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only and messages should not be considered any official expression by the organization.