Volume 28 : Issue 317 : "text" Format
Messages in this Issue:
Re: Ken Auletta: Why Oprah Needs Cable
Re: Compatibility of 3G GSM with HSPA 7.2 and LTE service
WikiLeaks releases 573.000 pager intercepts from 9/11 2001.
====== 28 years of TELECOM Digest -- Founded August 21, 1981 ======
Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet. All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote. By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent. Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.
We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime. Geoffrey Welsh
See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer, and other stuff of interest.
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:21:43 -0600
From: John Mayson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Re: Ken Auletta: Why Oprah Needs Cable
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Neal McLain <email@example.com> wrote:
> Maybe Auletta (along with John Mayson, Bill Horne, and John David Galt) are
> right: broadcast television is dying.
That I do. I honestly have no idea if and when it'll ever happen. My
theory is cable-only networks and Internet TV are going to continue to
chip away at over-the-air television and one of the large networks is
going to shock the country by announcing they're dropping their
affiliates and going cable-only. I don't think it's out of the
question to see an NBC among the TNT's, MTV's, an A&E's of the world.
> But I think Auletta underestimates the power of the NAB.
That is true. I'm waiting for them to ask Congress for a bailout. Of
course that would muddy the waters given all the networks have
expansive news departments. If party "X" gave billions of taxpayer
dollars to the networks, would those networks criticize party "X"?
One advantage to all of this is it would free up a whole lot of
bandwidth of TV stations went dark.
John Mayson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Austin, Texas, USA
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:16:58 -0500
From: tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net>
Subject: Re: Compatibility of 3G GSM with HSPA 7.2 and LTE service
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:10:40 -0500, Thad Floryan <email@example.com> wrote:
> The "Tech Blogs" of the San Francisco Chronicle's SFGate web site:
> yesterday states:
> " [...]
> " AT&T said it's making strides in building up its 3G coverage and
> " performance by upgrading more than 800 cell cites and deploying
> " more 850 MHz spectrum for 3G use. AT&T said it has spent $65
> " million locally this year and has doubled network capacity in the
> " last 45 days. [Note: local = SF Bay Area]
> " The upshot is: more coverage, better 3G performance and more
> " in-building penetration, precisely the stuff AT&T users have been
> " asking for.
> " [...]
> " The company plans to begin rolling out HSPA 7.2 by the end of
> " next year, (next year for the Bay Area) which will double 3G
> " speeds. And it's got LTE coming perhaps next year and into 2011.
> " "We know there are still challenges and we will continue in invest
> " in more network upgrades," said AT&T spokesman John Britton.
> So, what happens when HSPA 7.2 and LTE are rolled-out? Do those of
> us with 3G GSM phones end up with non-functioning devices and are
> forced to buy new phone instruments?
Dunno: in Poland, with Orange (PL) anyway, HSPA 7.2 falls gracefully
back to as slow as GPRS, through some retraining-like mechanism: so
everything in the GPRS/EDGE/UMTS/HSPA spectrum can be accomodated.
I've no idea what the unlightened US providers will do, though.
> Unless I'm going blind, I don't see new cellular phone instruments
> with the features and no junk that are equivalent to my 5-year-old
> Motorola RAZR V3. I don't play games on the phone and I don't text.
> Are those of us with similar "basic" but high-quality requirements
> (no $30 phones in this household) requirements going to be left out
> in the cold with our SIM cards rolling in the dust along with the
That's certainly what happened to T-Mobile customers with CSD WAP service
on their handsets (but no GPRS) when T-Mobile pulled the plug on CSD data
some years back: those handsets, sold on their WAP browsers' merits, just
became dumb voice/SMS phones for all practical purposes. And I'm stuck w/
three of them -- two ancient Moto TimePort P-7389s and a less old P-280.
> And, note, I'm not a Luddite. :-)
Now *that*, Floryan, I've know for *decades* :-) .
Cheers, -- tlvp
Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:48:26 -0500
From: danny burstein <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: WikiLeaks releases 573.000 pager intercepts from 9/11 2001.
"2001-09-11 08:50:25 Arch  B ALPHA A plane crashed thru the
twin towers. Real bad..BR"
> From 3AM on Wednesday November 25, 2009, until 3AM the following
> day (US east coast time), WikiLeaks will release over half a
> million US national text pager intercepts.
> The intercepts cover a 24 hour period surrounding the September 11,
> 2001 attacks in New York and Washington.
> To foster a deeper understanding, the messages will be released
> to the global community "live". That is, the first message,
> corresponding to 3AM September 11, 2001, five hours before the
> first attack, will be released at 3AM November 25, 2009 and the
> last, corresponding to 3AM September 12, 2001 at 3AM November 26,
> To follow the release, please visit http://911.wikileaks.org
- eyup, they've started.
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly to telecom-
munications topics. It is circulated anywhere there is email, in
addition to Usenet, where it appears as the moderated newsgroup
TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Bill Horne. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.
The Telecom Digest is moderated by Bill Horne.
Contact information: Bill Horne
43 Deerfield Road
Sharon MA 02067-2301
bill at horne dot net
Subscribe: email@example.com?body=subscribe telecom
Unsubscribe: firstname.lastname@example.org?body=unsubscribe telecom
This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then. Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!
URL information: http://telecom-digest.org
Copyright (C) 2009 TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.
Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list.
All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
End of The Telecom digest (3 messages)