TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Re: Cell Phone Shopping Frustrations

Re: Cell Phone Shopping Frustrations

T (nospam.kd1s@cox.nospam.net)
Tue, 17 Apr 2007 19:29:47 -0400

In article <telecom26.102.3@telecom-digest.org>, hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com
says:

> I've been notified my carrier will no longer support my existing
> wireless. (It's time to retire it anyway, the coffee can I use as the
> sounder is rusting out*.)

> It's down to Verizon or Cingular. Any thoughts on whose is better
> today? Things are changing so fast that one carrier who was good
> yesterday may be lousy today.

Eeek -- I'm not sure I'd want either. Cingular is now AT&T. I loathe both
companies.

And I also loath Sprint, after all, the SPR stands for Southern
Pacific Railroad, who vs. Santa Clara County in 1876 gave corporations
personhood.

Add to that new evidence that cellular radiation may be causing the
honeybees to become confused while navigating and you can see my
disdain for cellular telephony in general.

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Al Gillis: "Re: Cell Phone Shopping Frustrations"
Go to Previous message: USTelecom dailyLead: "Bell Canada Owner Weighs Its Strategic Options"
May be in reply to: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com: "Cell Phone Shopping Frustrations"
Next in thread: Al Gillis: "Re: Cell Phone Shopping Frustrations"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page