|Re: More on San Francisco and Oakland Numbering|
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:08:31 EDT
In a message dated Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:48:21 -0000, |
email@example.com (Robert Bonomi) writes:
> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, <Wesrock@aol.com> wrote:
>> The standard nationwide time for making changes was 3:01 a.m. Eastern
> What if you're keeping track of time to seconds?
> Is "one second after midnight" _really_ part of the previous "day"?
> What about the middle of the day?
> Is "one second after mid-day" (12:00 noon) really still part of the
> I'll agree that there is an ambiguity about whether 'midnight' is part
There is certainly no argument from me on this point. For most things,
Because of the ambiguity you cite, for most purposes 11:59 p.m. or
|Post Followup Article||Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply|
|Go to Next message: Steven Lichter: "Re: British Strowger SxS?"|
|Go to Previous message: Cellular-News: "Cellular-News for Friday 28th October 2005"|
|May be in reply to: Mark Roberts: "More on San Francisco and Oakland Numbering"|
|TELECOM Digest: Home Page|