TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Lawyers, Others Question Radio TIVO-like Devices


Lawyers, Others Question Radio TIVO-like Devices


Lisa Minter (lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com)
Sat, 28 May 2005 01:17:58 -0500

By Sue ZeidlerFri May 27, 5:45 PM ET

It's like Tivo for radio, but is it legal?

Various devices that enable listeners to record Internet radio streams
and then convert them into MP3 files are catching on and making Web
radio and streaming services more appealing to the general public.

But some legal experts say the recording software may violate digital
copyright laws and does little more than promote piracy.

"Obviously if people can use the TIVO-like unit to download a
recording from Web radio and pre-program it to search digital radio to
find tracks that you want, it's going to beg a big question with the
record industry," said Jay Cooper, an veteran entertainment
lawyer. "The thing to ask is if it is a violation and does it need to
be examined. Technology's way ahead of the law."

Cooper said that, under the Digital Copyright Millenium Act, users
have no right to duplicate copyrighted material from a computer hard
drive, only from a digital or analog recording device and then only
for personal use and not for redistribution.

Webcasters similarly are restricted from promoting the recording of
their content.

But with products such as San Francisco-based Applian Technologies'
Replay Radio, users can split, chop, trim and edit their recorded MP3
files from streamed music services.

The company's Web site says the product "works like a TiVo for
Internet Radio" and can turn streaming music into perfectly tagged MP3
song files.

"There's certainly a lawsuit waiting to happen because they're
basically enabling consumers to record and the recordings are not
authorized," said Jonathan Potter, executive director of the Digital
Media Association.

But Tom Mayes, co-owner of Applian, defended the practice.

"We've been doing this for a long time," he said, noting other
software recording programs were offering similar functions. "I think
its too late for these (record) companies to try to put a stranglehold
(on technology)."

On its Web sites, the company said its products are not intended for use in
circumventing copy protection or making illegal copies of coyprighted
content.

But at least two Webcasters have raised a red flag about Replay Radio.
RealNetworks Inc.'s (Nasdaq:RNWK - news) Rhapsody sent Applian a
letter requesting it take Rhapsody's name off a Web page at
(www.replay-music.com) that lists streaming music services that work
with the software.

"Using software like Replay Radio to record Rhapsody subscription
streams violates our terms of service," said Matt Graves, a spokesman
for Rhapsody.

Yahoo Inc.'s (Nasdaq:YHOO - news) MusicMatch concurred.

On Replay Radio's Web site, the company has partially obscured the
reference to Rhapsody and MusicMatch, by inserting hyphens for parts
of the spellings.

"Rhapsody sent us a note from their legal department telling us not to
use their name on our Web site and I said OK," said Mayes.

Copyright 2005 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily.

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Lisa Minter: "Internet Radio is Gaining, But Problems Remain"
Go to Previous message: Monty Solomon: "Sales of Cell Phones Totally Off the Hook / 180.6 Million Units"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page