Thor Lancelot Simon (tls@panix.com) Tue, 10 May 2005 04:04:38 UTC

Review Index Sorted By: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: DevilsPGD: "Re: Name Twin's Misdeeds Plague a Good Driver" Previous message: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com: "Re: Who Gets to See the E-mail of the Deceased?" May be in reply to: paul@robinson-telephone.com: "Phone Line on cat 5 10-Base-T Ethernet?" TELECOM Digest: Home Page

In article <telecom24.204.8@telecom-digest.org>, Robert Bonomi <bonomi@host122.r-bonomi.com> wrote: > In article <telecom24.203.6@telecom-digest.org>, > Also, beware of "100Base-TX". that trailing 'X' is signficant. That's wrong. All 100Mbit Ethernet on copper -- now that 100VG/AnyLan is rather definitively dead, and excluding a few oddities like shielded twisted pair -- is "100baseTX". Gigabit on copper, however, is just "1000baseT". Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com "The inconsistency is startling, though admittedly, if consistency is to be abandoned or transcended, there is no problem." - Noam Chomsky

Post Followup Article	Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: DevilsPGD: "Re: Name Twin's Misdeeds Plague a Good Driver"
Go to Previous message: hancock4@bbs.cpcn.com: "Re: Who Gets to See the E-mail of the Deceased?"
May be in reply to: paul@robinson-telephone.com: "Phone Line on cat 5 10-Base-T Ethernet?"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page