TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Re: Connecticut's Suit Against Vonage is Less Than Baseless

Re: Connecticut's Suit Against Vonage is Less Than Baseless

Thor Lancelot Simon (tls@panix.com)
Thu, 5 May 2005 07:13:02 UTC

In article <telecom24.197.8@telecom-digest.org>, Jack Decker
<jack-yahoogroups@workbench.net> wrote:

> And what about the fact that Connecticut filed the suit just about on
> the eve of today's announcement that Vonage will work with Verizon
> (the main local telco in Connecticut) to enable E911 solutions? Maybe

Jack,

Sometimes it seems you can't get _any_ of your facts straight. The
"main local telco in Connecticut" is SNET.

Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com

"The inconsistency is startling, though admittedly, if consistency is
to be abandoned or transcended, there is no problem." - Noam Chomsky

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Tony P.: "Re: Connecticut's Suit Against Vonage is Less Than Baseless"
Go to Previous message: Telecom dailyLead from USTA: "FCC Chief Seeking E911 Requirement for VoIP"
May be in reply to: Jack Decker: "Connecticut's Suit Against Vonage is Less Than Baseless"
Next in thread: Tony P.: "Re: Connecticut's Suit Against Vonage is Less Than Baseless"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page