|Re: Some Concerned About Privacy Implications of E-ZPass System|
|Isaiah Beard (firstname.lastname@example.org)|
Mon, 28 Mar 2005 11:36:18 -0500
Stuart Barkley wrote:|
> other purposes.
There actually is a rather low-tech measure that works very well:
Not as convenient as an off switch, but it does solve the problem of
E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
|Post Followup Article||Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply|
|Go to Next message: email@example.com: "Re: Time for the Recording Industry to Face the Music"|
|Go to Previous message: Paul A Lee: "Re: OT/Tangent (was Re: We Don't Need no Steenkin Line Sharing)"|
|May be in reply to: Wesrock@aol.com: "Some Concerned About Privacy Implications of E-ZPass System"|
|Next in thread: Lisa Hancock: "Re: Some Concerned About Privacy Implications of E-ZPass System"|
|TELECOM Digest: Home Page|