|Re: Caller pays, was Young Cell Users Rack Up Debt|
|Tony P. (firstname.lastname@example.org)|
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:45:27 -0500
In article <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org says...|
>> That a cell user pays for incoming calls is ridiculous and flies in
> Well, yeah, but that a cell user can talk on a handheld phone while
> Think of your cell phone as a FX line to your pocket.
Even that is about to be relegated to history.
With the penetration of 802.11 gear and carriers like Vonage saying
As far as FX -- is it even necessary any longer?
|Post Followup Article||Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply|
|Go to Next message: Tony P.: "Re: Wal-Mart Stung in $1.5 Million Bar-Code Scam"|
|Go to Previous message: Tony P.: "Re: Vonage Customer Cares DOESN'T really care"|
|TELECOM Digest: Home Page|