|Re: USTA Sends Strange Letter to Wal-Mart|
|Mark Atwood (firstname.lastname@example.org)|
Mon, 27 Dec 2004 01:49:21 GMT
John Levine <email@example.com> writes:|
>> I also hope that access charge regime gets fixed soon. At least then
> Completely agreed. If VoIP is so great, it should be able to support
Should email have similar "obligations"?
So long as I know what I'm getting, I am perfectly happy paying
And, VoIP or no, the USF should be elimated. Now. Immediately.
|Post Followup Article||Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply|
|Go to Next message: Dave Garland: "Re: My High Hopes About Google Ads"|
|Go to Previous message: Wesrock@aol.com: "Re: What Tandem in Telcom Means?"|
|May be in reply to: Jack Decker: "USTA Sends Strange Letter to Wal-Mart"|
|Next in thread: John Levine: "Re: USTA Sends Strange Letter to Wal-Mart"|
|TELECOM Digest: Home Page|