TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Re: Cingular - AT&T ?

Re: Cingular - AT&T ?

Al Gillis (
Tue, 8 May 2007 19:54:42 -0700

TELECOM Digest Editor noted in response to <>
in message

(Minor deletions...)

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: The *A*merican *T*elephone and *T*elegraph
> Company's recent (last decade or so) history is thus: AT&T owned
> several operating companies of which two were Bell South and Southwestern
> Bell (1982). Cingular Wireless in those days was called 'Southwestern
> Bell Mobility' and it was the 'B' carrier in the old A/B 'competitor'
> versus 'wireline' arrangement. Then Judge Greene had his hissy fit and
> bashed up AT&T. A few years later, Southwestern Bell became SBC, and
> Cingular Wireless continued to be owned by SBC/Southwestern Bell, or
> about half it it at least. The other half of it was owned by Bell South,
> and it was decided to change its name from Southwestern Bell Mobility
> to 'Cingular Wireless' in order to reflect the fact that it was not an
> exclusive Southwestern Bell property. So half of Cingular belonged to
> SBC and half of it belonged to Bell South. AT&T Wireless decided to go
> out of business, mainly because they were doing such a poor job of
> running the company, and the AT&T Wireless infrastructure was sold in
> parts: quite a bit to SBC and the rest of it to Bell South. SBC was
> busy cannibalizing other telcos, including Illinois Bell/Ameritech.

(Minor deletions...)

Actually three former Bell companies had "South" in their names:
Southern Bell, South Central Bell and Southwestern Bell. Those
companies likely also had the ubiquitous "Telephone and Telegraph" in
their names as well!


Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: "Re: Cingular - AT&T ?"
Go to Previous message: USTelecom dailyLead: "Alltel Pursued by Private-Equity Suitors"
May be in reply to: "Cingular - AT&T ?"
Next in thread: "Re: Cingular - AT&T ?"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page