TELECOM Digest OnLine - Sorted: Privacy Groups Challenge Google's Deal With Double-Click

Privacy Groups Challenge Google's Deal With Double-Click

Eric Auchard, Reuters (
Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:03:00 -0500

By Eric Auchard

Consumer privacy groups on Friday sought to derail Google Inc.'s $3.1
billion deal to buy online ad supplier DoubleClick Inc., filing a
complaint with U.S. regulators to block the merger on privacy grounds.

Groups led by the Electronic Privacy Information Center have filed the
complaint with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission arguing the merger
would violate agreed limits on how much data advertisers collect on
consumers and seeking an injunction.

"Google's proposed acquisition of DoubleClick will give one company
access to more information about the Internet activities of consumers
than any other company in the world," the complaint by the privacy
activist groups argues.

New York-based DoubleClick responded in a statement by denying any
plan by Google and itself to link the various pools of anonymous data
their automated services collect on consumer Web surfing and Internet
search behavior.

DoubleClick serves up billions of graphical display ads every day from
corporate marketers on thousands of sites across the Web. Google, the
leader in an alternative form of online marketing that places ads
alongside Web search results, would emerge as an even more powerful
force in the online ad market if the DoubleClick deal closes as
planned later in 2007.

DoubleClick denied that the data it collects through its system for
serving graphical ads to Web site visitors would be combined with
Google data on consumer Web-searching habits so as to keep tabs on
consumers' spending or browsing habits.

DoubleClick said information collected by its ad-delivery technology
is retained by marketing clients who use its system, not DoubleClick
itself, and that those rights would not change once Google acquires
it. DoubleClick has only limited rights to use such data to identify
aggregate trends, the company said.

"Further, Google would not be able to match its search data to the
data collected by DoubleClick, as DoubleClick does not have the right
to use its clients' data for such purposes," the company said.

The challenge comes a month after Google, which collects mountains of
data on its users Web search habits, said within 18 to 24 months it
aimed to "anonymize," or obscure key details on, surfing habits that
could identify individuals. Previously, Google had kept data "as long
as it was useful."

The 11-page EPIC complaint filed on Friday with the FTC criticizes the
privacy safeguards both Google and DoubleClick have in place and seeks
an injunction to block their combination unless the companies present
a plan that provides for stricter data privacy protections.

The groups urge the FTC to force Google to adopt stricter privacy
guidelines applied in Canada and some European nations on how much
personal data organizations can collect and store.

They asked the FTC to assess the ability of Google to record, analyze,
track, and profile the activities of Internet users with data that is
both personally identifiable and data that is not personally

Unless such steps are taken, EPIC asked the FTC to halt Google's
tie-up with DoubleClick, its largest deal to date.

Washington, D.C.-based EPIC led a successful campaign in 2000 to block
a plan by DoubleClick to combine data from a national marketing
database it had acquired and its own anonymous data collected from the
computers of Web surfers.

The fallout from the controversy led DoubleClick to back off the plan
and to provide consumers with an "opt out" option to block DoubleClick
software that tracks Web surfing habits. The FTC then dropped a probe
of the company.

(Additional reporting by Paul Thomasch in New York)

Copyright 2007 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at (or)

For more news and headlines, please go to: (also)

Post Followup Article Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply
Go to Next message: Danny Burstein: "National Bar (as in Lawyers) Exam vs. Google and Earthlink"
Go to Previous message: Steven Titch, Heartland Institute: "Telecom Taxes Are Unduly Harsh and Regressive"
TELECOM Digest: Home Page