Pat, the Editor

For your convenience in reading: Subject lines are printed in RED and Moderator replies when issued appear in BROWN.
Previous Issue (just one)
TD Extra News
Add this Digest to your personal   or  

 

TELECOM Digest     Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:25:00 EDT    Volume 24 : Issue 260

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    New Services Link Mobile Users to Online Magazines (Lisa Minter)
    Verisign to Manage .net Web Registry 6 More Years (Lisa Minter)
    California Forest Cameras Snoop on Wildlife (Lisa Minter)
    Fancy Math Takes on je ne sais Quoi (Lisa Minter)
    'Phone Tapping' Modem Traffic ? (jg@earthlink.net)
    Re: Is There True Pay-as-You-Go Cellphone? (John McHarry)
    Re: Is There True Pay-as-You-Go Cellphone? (Joseph)
    Re: Microwave Fading 6 Gig (GlowingBlueMist)
    Re: Microwave Fading 6 Gig (Tony P.)
    Re: Verizon's Voice Mailboxes Now Give 'Shout Out' to Verizon (P Romfh)
    Re: Verizon's Voice Mailboxes Now Give 'Shout Out' to Verizon (Justin)
    Re: Verizon's Voice Mailboxes Now Give 'Shout Out' to Verizon (Tim)
    Re: MCI Now Charging Extra on Payphones Using Phone Card! (Van Hefner)
    Re: Can You Disable Text Messaging? (jon@earthlink.net)
    Re: SBC New Low Price (Tim@Backhome.org)
    Re: Why There Are Questions About GoDaddy (T. Sean Weintz)
    Re: Cannot Cancel My AT&T Service After Moving to Vonage (johnspilker)

Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com>
Subject: New Services Link Mobile Users to Online Magazines
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:08:10 -0500


Two companies are combining online-only glossy magazines with mobile short
message texting services to link mobile handset users to Internet
publications even when they are not online. The companies -- Norwegian
publisher Fast Forward Media Group and Belgian technology company
Allisblue -- presented their new ways of connecting consumers to
publications on Thursday at a conference of European publishers.

Many of the publishers are struggling to find ways to earn money on
the Internet, which is luring away readers of their print
publications.

With the new combination, consumers on the go will be able to send
keywords to a short telephone number from their handsets, after which
they will be sent emails with links to magazines they have requested,
the two companies said.

The animated magazines, which can be leafed through like real
magazines, feature links to music, film and other multimedia content,
which is sponsored by advertisers or which can be bought and paid for
from the mobile phone account. Fast Forward Media said it would start
the service with free online magazines such as PlayMusicMagazine.com. 
It expected to add more keywords, enabling consumers to compile
tailored magazines and messages.

Allisblue provides patented SMS-to-email technology, which allows
consumers to send text messages instantly after picking up keywords
from friends, billboards or on the radio and then find links to
magazines in their email inboxes when they log on.

"Almost everyone has a mobile phone, and 70 percent have email
addresses, but outside the office, 18 to 35 years olds are only online
for an average 35 minutes a day. The rest of the time they're in the
real world, carrying a mobile. This connects them to the online
world," said Allisblue Chief Executive Eric Delfosse.

He said he was talking to three venture capitalist firms about
additional funds to boost expansion of this service.

Allisblue is starting in Belgium on short dial 3699 and will bring the
service to other European countries. Telecoms operators can also
expect to get a cut from the premium SMS services.


Copyright 2005 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily.

------------------------------

From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com>
Subject: Verisign to Manage .net Web Registry 6 More Years
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:09:33 -0500


By Spencer Swartz

VeriSign Inc., the top manager of Internet domain names that allow
people to find and surf Web sites, will keep control of Internet
addresses that end in .net for six more years, the group that oversees
Internet address allocation said on Thursday.

The decision was expected after VeriSign in March got a tentative nod
for the continued operation of the .net registry, which has provided
VeriSign with about $20 million annually in revenue.

VeriSign beat four other applicants for the registry, said the
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN, the
private-public Internet oversight group.

VeriSign's current agreement for .net was scheduled to expire on June
30.  Under VeriSign's new contract, which takes effect in July, the
company will charge $4.25 annually for a new .net registry from $6
previously.

The .net registry is a relatively small part of total Internet domain
registrations, accounting for 7 percent of all domain name
registration. The .com registry accounts for 47 percent of all domain
name registrations, according to the company.

VeriSign retains the rights to the .com registry until 2007 when it
will have to renew that contract, which provides the company with
about $200 million annually in revenue.

Analysts have generally believed that losing the .net registry would
have been more of a "headline" risk than a big revenue or profit
problem to VeriSign.

VeriSign took over the .net registry in 2000 after it bought Network
Solutions, which had been running the domain.

VeriSign, through a spokesman, said it was pleased with ICANN's
decision and would continue to make investments in operating Internet
domains.

In April, the company said it will add high-powered computer servers
that deliver up Web pages to users' browsers over the next two years
to meet increased Internet use in emerging markets such as Brazil,
India and eastern and central Europe.

VeriSign, which posted about $1.2 billion in revenues in 2004, is also
a top provider of ringtones, and processes millions of e-commerce
transactions every day for thousands of businesses who effectively
outsource their online payment systems to VeriSign.

VeriSign's stock on Thursday closed up 2 cents at $30.82 on
Nasdaq. The stock's 52-week high is $36.09.

Copyright 2005 Reuters Limited.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily.


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I would hope that as ICANN sets up
these new registrar contracts they would be insisting on certain
conditions to protect the integrity of the net. Probably they are
not, however. Just allow things to go like status-quo at present
which is considered 'good enough'.  PAT]

------------------------------

From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com>
Subject: California Forest Cameras Snoop on Wildlife
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:30:51 -0500


A 30-acre patch of forest near Idyllwild has been outfitted with
robotic cameras and other high-tech gadgets that spy on wildlife,
trees and even roots as part of a pioneering effort by scientists to
take nature's pulse.

Scientists sitting hundreds of miles away can remotely operate mostly
wireless devices, including a camera that swings on cables through the
trees, to watch bluebird eggs hatch, measure the growth of ferns and
study the impact of air pollution.

Devices in the outdoor laboratory allow nonintrusive, around-the-clock
monitoring.

"This is definitely going to change the way we do science," Michael
Allen, director of University of California, Riverside's Center for
Conservation Biology, told the Riverside Press-Enterprise.

"This is going to fill in the gaps of our knowledge," said Michael
Hamilton, director of the James San Jacinto Mountain Reserve where the
high-tech devices have been installed.

"You want to know when those hot moments occur," he said. "Is the
forest going to disappear in the next 50 years if the temperature
changes by three degrees? Now we have a window into those variables."

The information obtained could one day save lives and Earth itself,
Hamilton said.

The technology could eventually uncover ways to combat global warming,
track the deadly mosquito-borne West Nile virus, detect water
pollution before people drink it and predict the course of invasive
plants that alter landscapes and choke off water sources.

"The technology has profound implications," said Deborah Estrin,
director of the Center for Embedded Network Sensing at the University
of California, Los Angeles.

The James Reserve is a partner of the center, which was established in
2002 when it won $40 million in funding from the National Science
Foundation. Of that, $4 million went to the reserve, Hamilton said.

Sensors scattered throughout the reserve record temperature, humidity,
wind, rain, lightning and even how cool air sweeps in at night.

"It's a subtle but important change ecologically," Hamilton said,
explaining that the cool air can trigger seedlings to sprout.

Scientists at UC Riverside and UCLA can analyze the computerized data.

"That's kind of the downside -- we'll be spending too much time
staring at computer screens," Allen said.

On The Net: http://www.jamesreserve.net
Information from: The Press-Enterprise, http://www.pe.com

Copyright 2005 The Associated Press.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily.

------------------------------

Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:08:14 -0400
From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fancy Math Takes on je ne sais quoi


Click here to read this story online:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0602/p13s02-stct.html

Byline:  Gregory M. Lamb Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

(MOUNTAIN VIEW, CALIF.)English rules the Internet, which can be a
frustrating thing for the world's 1.3 billion Chinese and 322 million
Spanish-speakers. They outnumber Anglophones. Even online, two-thirds
of users speak something other than English at home.

So when someone promises a smoother and easier translation program,
people around the world tend to perk up their ears. It's a step closer
to a truly "worldwide" Web where every page would be available for
everyone to read in his or her own language.

The latest step comes later this month when the National Institute of
Standards and Technology (NIST), an arm of the United States
government, announces results of its tests of several machine-
translation systems. The agency is expected to give top honors, not to
the linguistic-savvy programs at universities and elsewhere, but to a
newcomer: Internet search company Google. Google's apparent success
suggests that a new approach to translation -- fancy math rather than
linguistic know-how -- may be the way forward in a field that has
struggled with the nuance and ambiguity of human language.

"Nobody in my team is able to read Chinese characters," says Franz
Och, who heads Google's machine-translation (MT) effort. Yet, they are
producing ever more accurate translations into and out of Chinese --
and several other languages as well.

To demonstrate the software's prowess, Mr. Och displayed an Arabic 
newspaper headline at a recent media tour of Google's headquarters in 
Mountain View, Calif. One commercially available MT program translated 
it: "Alpine white new presence tape registered for coffee confirms 
Laden." Then he displayed the translation from Google's prototype, 
which made considerably more sense: "The White House Confirmed the 
Existence of a New Bin Laden tape."

Of course, every MT program can point to strengths in its approach
versus weakness in others', experts say. The key is whether
statistical systems have become powerful enough to outperform the
intensive, rules-based systems now available.

"These translations were impossible a few years ago," Och says. But
the advent of ever-cheaper and faster data-crunching and the
mushrooming number of online documents have changed the
equation. Google has improved the algorithms for its MT program, he
says, by feeding its computers the equivalent of 1 million books of
text, using sources such as parallel translations of United Nations
documents.

Google's MT system is still under development and not available to the
public. Talking about it at an event for journalists and industry
analysts may mean that at least a test version will be coming in the
next few months, observers speculate.

"The results were very impressive, not the stupid machine translation 
you see on the Internet, which isn't really good," says Philipp 
Lenssen, who's been writing about Google in his online blog, Google 
Blogoscoped, since May 2003.

"This opens up a lot of new possibilities because you don't really
want to read machine translation at the moment," Mr. Lenssen says. He
speculates that it could be a perfect part of a Google Web browser,
should the company decide to release one. A user might search the
entire Web in his native language and have pages returned to him
already translated. "You can apply it to so many situations," he says.

Many translations, one root ...

Today, nearly every translation service offered on the Web -- AOL,
Alta Vista, Babblefish, even Google's -- is powered by translation
technology developed by Systran. The company, based in San Diego and
Paris, has been involved in MT for more than 30 years. Each day, it
translates more than 25 million Web pages.

MT involves years of hard work creating rules for translation between
a pair of languages, says Dimitris Sabatakakis, chief executive
officer of Systran. Using statistical methods, such as Google does, is
a well-known technique. "There is no technology breakthrough," he
says.  "Everybody does the same."

Machine translations, he says, work best if the original text is 
written with care to make it easily translatable, avoiding problematic 
or ambiguous words and phrases. More and more websites, especially 
those interested in e-commerce, are trying to create text that is 
easily translated, Mr. Sabatakakis says. Though machine translations 
are often less than perfect, he says, they're still useful to gain a 
quick idea of what a website is all about.

Today, Systran offers translations between 40 language pairs, and in
the next 12 months it will add 40 more, he says.

Each of the two approaches to MT -- hand-tailoring rules for translation 
between pairs of languages or using statistical analysis to detect 
patterns -- has its strengths and weaknesses, says Robert Frederking, 
who teaches at the Center for Machine Translation at Carnegie Mellon 
University in Pittsburgh.

Rules-based systems are time-consuming to develop and expensive, but
great for specialized tasks, such as translating a manual on
bulldozers, which might have a number of specific and unique terms.
"Systran has put literally hundreds of person years over a 30-year
period into building each language pair that they translate," Dr.
Frederking says.

Statistical systems have yet to prove that they can produce superior
translations, says Frederking, who hasn't seen the results of the most
recent NIST evaluations. But doing well at NIST means more than
showing off a few specific examples of better translations to
reporters, he says.

Even evaluating the quality of translations is difficult and
expensive, Frederking says. Since 2002 NIST has used a computer
program called Bleu to do its evaluations. It works "reasonably well,"
he says.

Unofficially good ...

The results of the NIST evaluation won't be released until later this
month. "Google did do _very_  well," says Mark Przybocki, the
machine-translation project coordinator at NIST, without confirming
Google's score. Some 20 research groups asked to be evaluated, each
trying new techniques not yet in commercial use. Each group was given
100 news items to translate from Arabic and Chinese into English.

Both rules-based and statistical MT systems can stumble badly on such
generalized reading. One problem is the vast and changing vocabulary.
One analysis of The Wall Street Journal, Frederking says, found that 1
or 2 percent of each edition consists of words that have never before
appeared in the paper. A statistical principle called Zipf's Law holds
that with so many words available, nearly every article will have some
uncommon words, he says. Unless statistical MT programs have seen
these words in many previous contexts, they can mistranslate them.

Proper nouns are a special challenge. Crooner Julio Iglesias, for
example, shouldn't be translated as July Churches, the literal English
translation of his Spanish name. An MT system should be able to spot
which words are names and not translate them, he says. But even that
doesn't help, if the translation is from Japanese or Chinese
characters. "You have to translate them into some kind of Latin
letters," he says.

Frederking predicts that eventually rules-based and statistical
methods will merge, with some knowledge of grammar and syntax being
added to the statistical approach, making for translation programs
that are both broad and deep.

Meanwhile, Google's announcement that it's working on a better MT
system creates interest in the field "and that's a good thing" says
Sabatakakis of Systran. But "we know that there are no magic
solutions.  You don't learn a language with statistical methods."

Countries with the most Internet users (in millions):

1. United States: 185.6
2. China: 99.8
3. Japan: 78.1
4. Germany: 41.9
5. India: 37.0
6. Britain: 33.1
7. South Korea: 31.7
8. Italy: 25.5
9. France: 25.5
10. Brazil: 22.3

Source: CIA World Factbook

Copyright 2005 The Christian Science Monitor.

The Christian Science Monitor -- an independent daily newspaper
providing context and clarity on national and international news,
peoples and cultures, and social trends.  Online at
http://www.csmonitor.com

Click here to order a free sample copy of the print edition of the
Monitor: http://www.csmonitor.com/aboutus/sample_issue.html

Sign up to have the Monitor's headlines sent directly to your inbox.
http://www.csmonitor.com/email 
(or view http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra.nytimes.html  and review
the far right hand column.)

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily.



[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Quite a few years ago, prior to my 
illness, I had several Digest web pages available in various
languages, and I am thinking about starting that again.  PAT]

------------------------------

From: jg@earthlink.net
Subject: 'Phone Tapping' Modem Traffic ?
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 06:13:12 -0500


Hi, 

I believe my 'voice line' is being tapped [the line feeds through the 
'opponents' switchboard].

How difficult is it for them to 'decode' my modem [to ISP] traffic ?
I'm guessing/hoping that my modem has to 'synchronise' with the ISP's
in analog mode, so it's difficult for a '3rd' party to listen ?

Is this right ?

Thanks for any info.

== John Grant.

------------------------------

From: John McHarry <jmcharry@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Is There True Pay-as-You-Go Cellphone?
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 03:03:28 GMT
Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net


On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 09:04:22 -0400, TELECOM Digest Editor noted in
response to Barry Margolin:

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Another reasonable plan is Alltel, 
> which I do not think has any expiry time on its prepaid minutes, 
> although it is bit more expensive per call. PAT]

I have that. It is something like $.35/min. incoming and
outgoing. There is a nasty monthly charge if you don't use it at all
for a month, but nothing if you use even one minute. Since I use it
for alarms from a public radio station transmitter site, it is almost
perfect. The only catch is that there is no roaming. The local area is
quite large, so that is not often a problem.

------------------------------

From: Joseph <JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Is There True Pay-as-You-Go Cellphone?
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 20:50:09 -0700
Reply-To: JoeOfSeattle@yahoo.com


On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 09:04:22 -0400, Barry Margolin
<barmar@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> I have a cellphone, but I use it very infrequently -- maybe about 5
> minutes a month.  I bought a Virgin Mobile prepaid cellphone, but they
> require that I purchase $20 of time every 90 days to keep it active.
> So I have to spend nearly $7/mo when I use at most $2/mo.

> Is there a cellphone plan closer to my needs?

A company that resells AT&T Wireless/Cingular TDMA IS-136 service
"Beyond Wireless" will activate any qualifying phone free with the
requirement that you make a call at least every 60 days.
Theoretically with their service you could have phone service for
months on end and not pay anything unless you used up all your
minutes.  The drawback (you knew there had to be one) is that they
only have local numbers in a limited number of locations so if the
number wasn't local to people calling you they would pay a toll charge
to call you.  

Outgoing calls cost 15 cents/minute down to 10 cents/minute if you
purchase a large number of minutes refill voucher.  I have two former
AT&T Wireless TDMA phones that I've activated on their service to use
if the need arises.  I should also add that calls that are not "on
network" are charged at four times the regular rate so if you are in
an area where AT&T Wireless never had service it would not be a good
fit for you as any minutes you would use would be off network and
would cost you four times the regular amount.  If however you are in
an AT&T network area it's a good deal especially for the casual
caller.

Theoretically you could go to a resale/thrift shop and get a used AT&T
wireless handset and have Beyond activate it for you and you'd have an
extremely economical package.

http://gobeyond2.chainreactionweb.com/catalog/airtime_rates.php

And there's a trick to ordering minutes from them if you're not in one
of the areas they serve.  Set up an account using one of the states
that they do serve and use your credit card billing address minus the
state (use one of the states served.)  Otherwise you won't be able to
set up an account to buy minutes.

------------------------------

From: GlowingBlueMist <nobody@invalid.com>
Subject: Re: Microwave Fading 6 Gig
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 03:12:18 -0500
Organization: SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source


HarryHydro <harryhydro@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:telecom24.259.5@telecom-digest.org:

> Hi Folks:

>    I wrote a qbasic program that scans 4 Alcatel radios.  It also
> pages me on problems.  I was called almost 10 times around 1:30AM this
> morning (6/9/05) and again around 4:00AM even more times!  My heel are
> draggin'.  Anyway,  this has been going on for the last few days.
> These are not stormy evenings, or even windy.  In the plots this
> program makes, I see signals dropping, or maybe it's noise level
> increasing, enough to break microwave paths.  This is 6gig stuff ... The
> 4 radios at this site point in different directions, and the radios
> almost go wacky the same time, but not exactly.  For a half hour, the
> signal on one radio faded to almost break while the others were doing
> OK.  Sometimes the two receivers on one radio will fade together,
> sometimes not. (diversity)  I've associated some of these to mag
> storms, but most are weather related.  However, these last few days
> have been pretty stable.

> Could it be temperature inversions at 1:30 in the morning doing this?

> Harry

nI don't know about your location but when I was monitoring microwave
sites for the military in Germany, most of the temperature inversion
problems we ran into was in the early morning.  The hills would cool
off but the valleys would hold the heat unless a breeze was blowing.
As you have already identified, the fact that your diversity beams
tend to drop out at slightly different times helps to point to a
temperature inversion problem if weather was ruled out.

We did tend to have one other problem with fighter aircraft using our
towers as practice targets.  Either the bulk of the aircraft
themselves or the aircraft electronic systems would drop the link as
they came in for the final run.

------------------------------

From: Tony P. <kd1s@nospamplease.cox.reallynospam.net>
Subject: Re: Microwave Fading 6 Gig
Organization: ATCC
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 07:11:40 -0400


In article <telecom24.259.5@telecom-digest.org>, harryhydro@hotmail.com 
says:

> Hi Folks:

> I wrote a qbasic program that scans 4 Alcatel radios.  It also
> pages me on problems.  I was called almost 10 times around 1:30AM this
> morning (6/9/05) and again around 4:00AM even more times!  My heel are
> draggin'.  Anyway,  this has been going on for the last few days.
> These are not stormy evenings, or even windy.  In the plots this
> program makes, I see signals dropping, or maybe it's noise level
> increasing, enough to break microwave paths.  This is 6gig stuff ... The
> 4 radios at this site point in different directions, and the radios
> almost go wacky the same time, but not exactly.  For a half hour, the
> signal on one radio faded to almost break while the others were doing
> OK.  Sometimes the two receivers on one radio will fade together,
> sometimes not. (diversity)  I've associated some of these to mag
> storms, but most are weather related.  However, these last few days
> have been pretty stable.

> Could it be temperature inversions at 1:30 in the morning doing this?

It is possible. 6GHz is millimeter radio, and water vapor does a number 
on that. 

------------------------------

From: Pete Romfh <promfhTAKE@OUThal-pc.org.invalid>
Subject: Re: Verizon's Voice Mailboxes Now Give 'Shout Out' to Verizon
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:53:40 -0500
Organization: Not Organized


Monty Solomon wrote:

> Verizon's Voice Mailboxes Now Give 'Shout Out' to
> Verizon Wireless Phones When New Messages Arrive

> Home and Business Customers in N.Y.C. and New England Can
> Receive TXT Alerts on Their Verizon Wireless Phones

> NEW YORK, June 9 /PRNewswire/ -- Verizon home and
> business voice mailboxes now can alert customers on their
> Verizon Wireless phone that someone has left a message.

> Starting today, Verizon voice-messaging customers in New
> York City and New England can add a feature that sends a
> text message to any Verizon Wireless short text messaging-
> capable phone with an alert that a new voice message has
> been left on the customer's landline phone.

> http://finance.lycos.com/home/news/story.asp?story=49739949

> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: What is supposed to make
> that so exceptional? Cingular Wireless has always had an
> icon on the display screen indicating voice message
> waiting, and I have always had my phone set to make three
> chirps when that icon is turned on.   PAT]

The "New" feature is having the voicemail on your home phone send a
message to your cellphone saying a message has been left. Most
voicemail systems have had this feature for years. You could have it
call your cellphone or a pager. The SMS message is sort of a new
wrinkle on an existing service.


Pete Romfh, Telecom Geek & Amateur Gourmet.
promfh at hal dash pc dot org

------------------------------

From: Justin Time <a_user2000@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Verizon's Voice Mailboxes Now Give 'Shout Out' to Verizon
Date: 10 Jun 2005 05:31:34 -0700


Hey -- anything to drive the number of minutes of usage up.  (OBTW Pat,
they are not talking about voicemail left on the cell phone, but on
your landline.)

------------------------------

From: Tim@Backhome.org
Subject: Re: Verizon's Voice Mailboxes Now Give 'Shout Out' to Verizon
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:41:13 -0700
Organization: Cox Communications


I find forwarding our home phone to my cell phone when we are on a trip
works better.

Monty Solomon wrote:

>       Verizon's Voice Mailboxes Now Give 'Shout Out' to Verizon
>       Wireless Phones When New Messages Arrive

> Home and Business Customers in N.Y.C. and New England Can Receive TXT
> Alerts on Their Verizon Wireless Phones


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: That's how I do it also, even though I
don't go on many car trips. Prairie Stream (local telco) has my 
landline set to 'forward on busy/no answer' to my Cingular cell phone. 
And since we here get unlimited local area calling, my landline
620-331 phone forwards after 3 rings to my cellular 620-330 number. My
regular callers know they are getting forwarded to my cell phone when
after 3 audible rings (in their ear) they hear a couple seconds of 
silence as the call is 'pulled away' from the landline and transferred
to my cell phone. When I am truly not available, then the Cingular
cell phone voice mail takes the call. PAT]

------------------------------

Reply-To: <postmaster@thedigest.com>
From: William Van Hefner <postmaster@thedigest.com>
Subject: Re: MCI Now Charging Extra on Payphones When Using Phone Card!
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 23:27:05 -0700
Organization: Vantek Communications, Inc.


hizark21@yahoo.com wrote about: MCI Now Charging Extra on Payphones
When Using Phone Card! on: 8 Jun 2005 17:52:19 -0700


> MCI now charging extra payphones when using their phone card!!!

> MCI has started charging a 65 cent surcharge on calls using their =
phone cards ...

Most companies have been adding payphone surcharges to their calling
cards for a long, long time. This is absolutely nothing new. I have
some MCI pre-paid calling cards that I bought at Costco last
Christmas, and they plainly state that all calls made from payphones
will be hit with a 10 minute/unit surcharge. At the rate I bought the
cards at, that is a 29 cent surcharge.

It's simple to understand why carriers are charging this fee. First of
all, carriers have been forced to pay surcharges to payphone providers
(via their carrier, OSP or reseller) on each call for years now. The
compensation rate for these charges was raised more than six months
ago to an all-time high.

When you add the existing charges to the fact that carriers like MCI
have to cut individual checks to hundreds of different carriers and
resellers each month, you are talking about a major accounting
nightmare. In some cases, MCI itself may be the payphone carrier,
and it then has to cut a check to a division of its own company,
which in turn has to send checks to literally thousands of
independent payphone owners all over the country. If the payphone uses
an MCI reseller or OSP, you have to add yet another middleman.

You can blame our own Federal Communications Commission for caving-in
to payphone owners and others involved in the industry for raising the
limit on these surcharges. I guess that they feel sorry for the
payphone companies, who have probably seen their revenues drop by 90%
in the past 10 years.


William Van Hefner
Editor - TheDigest.Com
http://www.thedigest.com


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: But I have to wonder what was wrong
with the old 'Separations and Settlements' process AT&T used for
about ninety years.  And by the way, we had a response on this 
yesterday as well, where the writer claimed that the 'fee to write
checks' also cut into the profit telco made on calls using calling
cards, etc. Actually, even without a master 'Separations and 
Settlements' process like AT&T used to administer, the telcos all
have their own proceedures for this, and for the benefit of our
writer yesterday, each time someone makes a call from a payphone, 
the carrier does not sit down and write a check for 65 cents or
whatever. They go for about a year at a time, then they subtract
what one owes the other from what the second one owes the first
one and settle up the difference. In other words, John Q. Payphone
Owner has a thousand dollars due him from MCI, and he owes MCI nine
hundred fifty dollars. MCI offsets what they owe each other, and
send John Q. Payphone Owner the difference, if any, or a bill if
he owes them. Now John Q. may have been collecting the aggragate
differences each month from the local telco -- let's call them
Verizon for example (via the same technique) so when MCI makes an
annual or semi-annual settlement with Verizon one of them says
"do not forget about John Q and what he has coming"; they compare
notes and give John his few dollars due. There is _not_ all that
massive numbers of checks written and 'major expenses which cuts 
down on the profits' as our correspondent yesterday claimed.  PAT] 

------------------------------

From: jon@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: Can You Disable Text Messaging?
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:56:13 -0500


Joseph wrote:

>>> That's interesting. Both Verizon and Sprint have disabled SMS
>>> completely when I requested it. Why can't T-Mobile?

>> Maybe it has to do with the way GSM works.  You didn't mention AT&T
>> Wireless or Cingular.  SMS is part of the GSM spec.  I don't know if
>> that's the case with CDMA.

Isaiah Beard wrote:

> It is, but can be inhibited if need be.  I have to say, SMS seems to
> be GSM's achilles' heel.  A lot of signalling functions on GSM appear
> to be handled by thinly vieled SMS messages, stuff that would be
> handled on a more formal level in CDMA through the paging channel.

Are there on-line specs for GSM and/or CDMA ?

> I'm willing to bet that T-Mobile is unwilling to fully disable SMS on
> an account because in many markets, they still use it for voicemail
> and other notifications.

Do they send the voicemail 'digitally compressed' [eg. simulated] ?

What is the average bits/sec which they need ?

Thanks for any info.

Chris Glur

------------------------------

From: Tim@Backhome.org
Subject: Re: SBC New Low Price
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 05:47:07 -0700
Organization: Cox Communications


> [TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: As I read the original thread here, I
> was of the impression it was not the wire pair(s) in question, it
> was getting dial tone on that pair which telco would not supply
> because of a billing dispute with a previous tenant. Telco could care
> less about the wire pair; run as many of them as you wish, but then
> get telco to interconnect. Was I wrong on this assumption?  PAT]

Perhaps the thread was bifurcated, but I didn't see the discussion
about a billing dispute.  The message I responded to was the debate
about whether dial tone is required for a rental unit, as opposed to a
good pair that is capable of working.  And, to what extent the
landlord is responsible.

As to a billing dispute, in California, all the landlord would have to
do is certify to the LEC that the deadbeat tenant has moved out.  If
the LEC refused to provide service to the new tenant at that point the
California PUC could resolve that in short order.


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: The part of the thread we got here from 
AES discussed how the original tenant skipped owing money, and that
although the landlord (apparently, I do not recall reading it) did
in fact tell telco he had _new_ tenants, telco did not accept that as
the complete story _in the proper context_ and said they wanted their
money. And, if telco's version was correct, then the PUC would back
them up.  PAT]

------------------------------

From: T. Sean Weintz <strap@hanh-ct.org>
Subject: Re: Why There Are Questions About GoDaddy 
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:22:29 -0400
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com


Pat wrote:

> So I, John Q. Spammer go to an ISP and ask for a connection. I tell
> ISP I want to be known as 'spam.com'. I do not tell the ISP I want
> to be known as '208.31.42.98' 

Um, Pat -- that's not correct. The ISP has absolutely nothing to do with 
your domain name. You don't tell him what you want to be known as at all 
in most cases. Usually they just assign you an IP address. If you have 
your own AS number and assigned block and are going to run BGP, you tell 
them what your IP is. But in either case, no domain names are involved.
The only time the ISP might nbeed to know that info is if in addition to 
being your ISP they are also providing additional value added services, 
above and beyond just being an ISP, such as DNS hosting or SMTP mail.

> ... ISP says I will take care of all that once you get installed by
> a registrar.

The registrar is the only business that needs to know about your
domain name. Our ISP does not know/need to know/care what our domain
name is.

> Quite a difference, the registrar _is_ like directory assistance,
> but different in the sense that directory assistance does not
> _assign_ anything, but simply reports on what has been assigned. So
> if the registrar was not a greedy son-of-a-bitch and started saying
> NO! that would help a lot.  Oh yes, I know that John Q. Spammer
> could try to cut a deal under the table direct with the ISP, or
> whomever it is that physically makes his connections in and out, but
> ISPs working in concert with registrars could do a lot to clean up
> the mess.

Given that in most cases involving spammers, the ISP has no way of 
knowing what registered domains are using a block of addresses, that 
won't work.

> And like the old system which was used with FIDO, when a site
> becomes a nuisance, he gets delisted, and if others up the line do
> not cooperate then _they_ get delisted also.  The rule ISP's and
> registrars would use is that if John Q. Spammer was expelled by
> whoever, then no one touches him or works with him. PAT]

There is such a system in place more or less. The ROKSO list run by 
spamhaus is pretty much what you describe.

It's of limited use, however. The spammers use prepaid debit cards
under phoney names to register domains, so they can't be identified
before hand by the registrar.

Most spammers these days don't even really have an internet connection
for their business per se -- they hire a sleazy overseas company to
host their server for them. They use fake names again to do this. The
spam is sent as follows -- somone gets a consumer level dsl, dial up,
or cable internet account. They then use this ISP connection to get
trojan infected PC's worldwide to send the spam for them. Since no
spam comes form their own account, it never gets traced to that
account. The only identifiable things are the domain name of the
server, the registrar of the domain name, and the company hosting the
server.


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Seems like an awfully convoluted way
of running your business, IMO. So my response would be to kill the
domain name of the server, chop off the registrar's head, and burn
down the company hosting the server. Fair enough?  As one writer here
yesterday pointed out, the ISPs could cure a huge amount of the 
problem (but I would say give the registrars some part of the job
also) if they gave a Good God Damn, which many of them do not, such
as MCI. And don't forget, MCI uses their employee Vint Cerf as their
front man/mouthpiece with ICANN, truly God's Gift to Netters everywhere.

And the small business people who run local ISP operations who _do_
care and _do_ attempt to check out new customers are treated like
imbiciles, the same as your Esteemed Moderator.   PAT]

------------------------------

From: johnspilker@msn.com
Subject: Re: Cannot Cancel My AT&T Service After Moving to Vonage
Date: 10 Jun 2005 09:20:22 -0700


They are charging us a monthly fee that amounts to $8 a month with
taxes. I did send a registered letter to AT&T legal department and got
a simple form letter that told me to contact Qwest. What an insult.
I've contacted Qwest for confirmation that the account was closed on
April 20. I'm not sure what to do next. I suppose I could file a
complaint with the FCC but I wouldn't expect any quick results.


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Forget for a minute that the FCC
does not care one way or the other about insults you have endured.
AT&T claims that Qwest is their agent, so send another registered
letter to Qwest (a copy of your original letter to AT&T) with a 
cover note saying "remove my AT&T service immediatly".   PAT]
 
------------------------------


TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

RSS Syndication of TELECOM Digest: http://telecom-digest.org/rss.html
  For syndication examples see http://www.feedroll.com/syndicate.php?id=308
    and also http://feeds.feedburner.com/telecom

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************

Visit http://www.mstm.okstate.edu and take the next step in your
career with a Master of Science in Telecommunications Management
(MSTM) degree from Oklahoma State University (OSU). This 35
credit-hour interdisciplinary program is designed to give you the
skills necessary to manage telecommunications networks, including
data, video, and voice networks.

The MSTM degree draws on the expertise of the OSU's College
of Business Administration; the College of Arts and Sciences; and the
College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology. The program has
state-of-the-art lab facilities on the Stillwater and Tulsa campus
offering hands-on learning to enhance the program curriculum.  Classes
are available in Stillwater, Tulsa, or through distance learning.

Please contact Jay Boyington for additional information at
405-744-9000, mstm-osu@okstate.edu, or visit the MSTM web site at
http://www.mstm.okstate.edu

              ************************

   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V24 #260
******************************

Return to Archives**Older Issues