For your convenience in reading: Subject lines are printed in RED and Moderator replies when issued appear in BROWN.
Previous Issue (just one)
TD Extra News

TELECOM Digest     Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:35:00 EST    Volume 24 : Issue 106

Inside This Issue:                             Editor: Patrick A. Townson

    Google Lets Users Customize News Site (Lisa Minter)
    Online Payment Company Settles Privacy Charges (Lisa Minter)
    Jail Sentence For Phone Line "Denial of Service" (Danny Burstein)
    FCC to Cellcos: Clean up Your Bills and Invoices (Danny Burstein)
    Wiring Two Lines on One Jack (emb120skw@aol.com)
    Technion (Choreboy)
    Re: Long Distance Carrier Verification (No Spam)
    Re: Drug Error Risk Tied to Computers (LB)
    Re: Long Distance Carrier Verification (bhamilton)
    Re: Phone Doesn't Disconnect (bhamilton)
    Re: Any Old Mechanical Systems Still in Use in USA? (bhamilton)
    Re: Home PBX and VoIP Tie-In (Lee Sweet)
    107-Year-Old Woman From Independence (Wesrock@aol.com)

Telecom and VOIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) Digest for the
Internet.  All contents here are copyrighted by Patrick Townson and
the individual writers/correspondents. Articles may be used in other
journals or newsgroups, provided the writer's name and the Digest are
included in the fair use quote.  By using -any name or email address-
included herein for -any- reason other than responding to an article
herein, you agree to pay a hundred dollars to the recipients of the
email.

               ===========================

Addresses herein are not to be added to any mailing list, nor to be
sold or given away without explicit written consent.  Chain letters,
viruses, porn, spam, and miscellaneous junk are definitely unwelcome.

We must fight spam for the same reason we fight crime: not because we
are naive enough to believe that we will ever stamp it out, but because
we do not want the kind of world that results when no one stands
against crime.   Geoffrey Welsh

               ===========================

See the bottom of this issue for subscription and archive details
and the name of our lawyer; other stuff of interest.  

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: 10 Mar 2005 19:10:13 -0800
From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com>
Subject: Google Lets Users Customize News Site


SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Web search leader Google Inc. on
Thursday said it added tools to its news site that lets users
customize the stories they see.

The move from Silicon Valley-based Google and Microsoft Corp.'s MSN
Internet unit added features to make it easier for their users to
create personalized welcome pages tailored with the information they
want to receive.

With the new tools, users of Google News can create customized pages
on the site that gathers news stories from around the Web, the company
said.

Google News users can now prioritize existing news topics such as top
stories, health, entertainment or sports to change the look of the
site's front page. Users also can create new categories to capture
news stories that contain certain key words.

Google News is available on mobile phones and handheld devices that
can read Web pages. News customization is now available only on
personal computers.

Separately, Yahoo announced on Thursday that it had given its mobile
users the ability to access all of their personalized My Yahoo
headlines and the first part of related stories, including those that
come from RSS and Atom feeds, on most mobile phones and handheld
devices in the United States.

My Yahoo recently added support for open content syndication standards
like Really Simple Syndication and Atom, which allow users to receive
content from sources such as news organizations and blogs.

Google gets the lion's share of its revenue from Web search advertising,
but does not show ads on its news site.

"It's something that we'll consider. We're not making any decisions at
this time," Director of Consumer Web Products Marissa Mayer said when
asked whether the company plans to add ads to its news site.

Google's news aggregation site is still in testing as the company
builds out its features.

Mayer added that Google was not trying to offer a personalized home
page like those from competitors, which allow users to view news or
information such as horoscopes or stock quotes and quickly connect to
other services such as e-mail.

"We're not trying to make this be your one-stop shop on the Web,"
Mayer said.

Shares of Google closed down $1.37, or 0.8 percent, to $79.98 on the
Nasdaq. Yahoo shares finished off 41 cents, or 1.3 percent to $31.91
also on Nasdaq.
           
NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily
media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra . Hundreds of new articles daily.

*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without
profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic
issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I
believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S.  Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner, in this instance, Reuters News Service.

For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

------------------------------

Date: 10 Mar 2005 19:12:15 -0800
From: Lisa Minter <lisa_minter2001@yahoo.com>
Subject: Online Payment Company Settles Privacy Charges


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An Internet payment company has agreed to
return the money it earned from selling a list of nearly 1 million
customers to telemarketers and junk mailers without permission,
federal regulators said on Thursday.

Utah-based CartManager International sold the names, addresses, phone
numbers and purchase history of consumers who used its "shopping cart"
software to make purchases on thousands of Web sites, the Federal
Trade Commission said.

Many of those Web sites told visitors that any personal information
they provided would be kept private, the FTC said.

CartManager said that it would retain "full ownership" of consumer
data, but buried that notice in a lengthy online agreement and did not
explain how it intended to use that information.

CartManager parent company Vision I Properties LLC agreed to pay back
the &#36;9,000 it earned from the sale of customer data and clearly
disclose when it intends to sell customer data in the future. The
company faces increased penalties if does not abide by the agreement.

CartManager was not immediately available for comment.

NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the daily
media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra . Hundreds of new articles daily.

*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without
profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic
issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I
believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S.  Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner, in this instance, Reuters Limited/Tech Tuesday.

For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

------------------------------

From: Danny Burstein <dannyb@panix.com>
Subject: Jail Sentence for Phone Line "Denial of Service"
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:17:30 -0500
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC


Fascinating ... could this be extended to spammers? Please? Looks close 
enough to be worth a looksee ...

"Ex-GOP Party Head Charged in Phone Jamming"

"By ERIK STETSON Associated Press Writer March 10, 2005, 1:23 PM EST"

"CONCORD, N.H. The former executive director of the New Hampshire 
Republican Party was sentenced Thursday to seven months in prison for 
jamming Democratic telephone lines during the 2002 election.

"Chuck McGee pleaded guilty to federal charges of conspiring to make 
anonymous calls with the intent to annoy or harass. He was also fined 
$2,000 and ordered to perform 200 hours of community service."

    ...

"The computer-generated calls -- more than 800 in all -- lasted for about 
an hour and a half and also disrupted a union phone line."

rest at (watch for line wrap):

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-gop-phone-jamming,0,1684971,print.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: I am not sure if they would warrant _jail_
time or not. It would depend on the judge's interpretation of the
facts; most spammers and/or telemarketers simply go through a list of
email addresses and/or phone numbers. A nusiance yes, but not the sort
of willful and deliberate behavior of Chuck McGee. Or even if you say
that spammers/telemarketers are a little bit deliberate and willful,
they do not single out one person or organization as this man did. 

I am reminded of the same situation happening to Jerry Falwell's
"Moral Majority" organization, in Lynchburg, VA several years ago.
Someone living in the Atlanta area programmed his computer to dial the
800 number for Falwell exactly once per minute, around the clock for
several weeks. The phone room operators in Lynchburg kept receiving 
these 'dead calls' (total silence) but because of the volume of calls,
no one detected anything unusual, just that they had a 'lost call', 
i.e. a call where the caller 'hung up' (so they thought) before an
operator was available to take the call. Finally an operator during 
the slower overnight hours wised up to the fact that these spurious
'lost calls' were coming once per minute at times when there was
absolutely no reason for them at all ... 

Their first thought was to blame the 'telephone company' and a call
to the Bell repair techs brought a couple of techs out to investigate.
This was a very large account for Bell, after all, with inbound 800
traffic totalling several hundred thousand dollars per month. The
techs wanted to appease the customer, and they got in that centrex
ACD (automatic call distributor) cabinet and over a couple days tried
to isolate the problem. Their main hassle was it was very difficult
to 'busy out' certain lines to test; the volume of 'regular' calls
was so heavy the techs had a hard time getting a line isolated to
busy it out, there was one seizure after another, often times several
seizures at the same instant. Finally, Bell came to the conclusion 
there was nothing wrong with the customer premise equipment. About the
same time, someone on Dr. Falwell's staff in charge of reconciling 
and paying the phone bill each month noticed that the same phone 
number was showing up 'quite a lot of the time', and Bell started
looking in that direction, still trying to appease the customer. 

Telco back-tracked it through AT&T to Atlanta, and telco there filled
in the blanks, and when telco security representatives and Atlanta
Police showed up with a search warrant, they found the computer busy
at its task, dialing 800-MoralMajority once per minute, sitting there
several seconds, then disconnecting and doing it again. Bell told
Falwell they would write it off as long as he (Falwell) okayed them
filing charges. If he would not file charges, they they would sue him
for payment instead. Falwell agreed to let the telco handle it for him
(obviuously!) and the total damage was a little over a million dollars
in bogus 800 charges, over the several months it had been going on. I
guess the guy wound up getting a jail term of six months or so, and
had to make a couple thousand dollars in restitution as part of his
parole agreement.  PAT]

------------------------------

From: Danny Burstein <dannyb@panix.com>
Subject: FCC to Cellcos: Clean up Your Bills and Invoices
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:12:02 -0500
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC


"FCC Extends Truth-in-Billing Rules to Wireless Phones; Seeks Comment on
Additional Measures to Increase Ability of Consumers to Make Informed
Choices ...

"Federal Communications Commission has expanded the federal consumer
protection rules that apply to consumers=D5 wireless phone bills. It has
also asked for comment on additional measures to facilitate the ability of
telephone consumers to make informed choices among competitive
telecommunications service offerings.

"The actions come in response to consumer concerns with the billing
practices of wireless and other interstate providers, outstanding
issues from the FCC=D5s 1999 Truth-in-Billing Order and a petition
filed by the National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates
(NASUCA).

rest at:

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257319A1.txt [a]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257319A1.doc [b]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257319A1.pdf [c]

with further info at:

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257319A2.txt [a]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257319A2.doc [b]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257319A2.pdf [c]

and

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257319A3.txt [a]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257319A3.doc [b]
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257319A3.pdf [c]


[a] mangled ascitt/txt
[b] Word Doc
[c] pdf

(Most FCC material is available in all three ways. URLs are
identical except for trailing extension.)

_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
            dannyb@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]

------------------------------

From: emb120skw@aol.com
Subject: Wiring Two Lines on One Jack
Date: 10 Mar 2005 19:21:37 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com


Hi,

I would like to wire one jack for two lines. Here is the setup of the
wires after opening the jack.

The red screw terminal has two blue and 1 orange wires connected to
it.  The green screw terminal has 2 white/blue and 1 white/orange wire
connected to it. I'm just curious as to why there are 3 wires
connected per terminal.

The yellow an black screw terminals are not connected to any
wires. Now what should I do to be able to access a second line?

Thank you!


[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: Red/green is traditionally one pair;
and yellow/black is  traditionally the second pair. You want to use 
the unused yellow/black screw terminals for your second line. Can
you tell us more about the _type of phone instrument_ currently in
use on your (I presume) working single line? With no other knowledge
it is difficult to answer your question; was this/is this part of
a business phone arrangment? Does the pair which is 'wired' at
present go to a working instrument?   PAT]

------------------------------

From: Choreboy <choreboyREMOVE@localnet.com>
Subject: Technion
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:18:35 -0500
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com


This afternoon I rushed into the room to answer a call on the third
ring.  "This is Tell Nants calling on behalf of Bell South in regards
to telemarketing.  Sorry we missed you.  If you have any questions,
call 1-866..."

It's pretty bad when somebody programs a robot to call homes and hang
up without saying what it's about.

The call came from 954 443 9404, which is Technion Communications.  On
the web I've found complaints that their telemarketing robots will
bombard a Bell South customer day after day.  Apparently the law
doesn't apply if the victim has a business relationship with the
client, in this case Bell South.

Two hours later I found a similar message on my answering machine,
again telling me to call Bell South at the 866 number.  Because the
robot was programmed start speaking immediately, I didn't get the
whole message.  That could lure the victim into calling in case it was
important.  (On the web I've found a document where Technion argues to
the FCC that the law doesn't apply if they can lure the victim into
making the call.)

It seems like harassment to me.  Can I do anything to stop it?  

Choreboy

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:12:52 -0500
From: No Spam <nospam@resi.com>
Subject: Re: Long Distance Carrier Verification


At 05:50 PM 3/10/05, Michael Muderick wrote to inquire:

> Has anyone tried 700-555-4141 lately to verify long distance carrier?
> It's still a published number, but in the Phila. area, I keep getting
> a busy signal.  Is there a new number available?

> Michael Muderick

I'm sure someone will chime in with the 'official' word, but in
practice I've always used 700-555-4141 as the inTER-lata PIC
verification, and 700-555-4242 as the inTRA-lata PIC verification (not
applicable in all markets).  That having been said, your carrier of
choice still has to have translations set up for that to work.  I
believe historically the LEC's would send anything in NPA 700 to the
PIC'd carrier.

It worked from my home phone about two months ago (Philly suburban),
and it does work from my Focal (clec) provided service here as well.

The other thing you can do is try 'double 0' to get to the PIC'd LD
operator.  That might tell you something, but if the PIC'd carrier is
a reseller, you could end up anywhere.

Good luck!

Joshua

my opinions are my own and not necessarily those of my employer
but sometimes we agree

------------------------------

From: LB@notmine.com
Subject: Re: Drug-Error Risk at Hospitals Tied to Computers
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:41:59 -0500


Monty Solomon wrote:

> By Scott Allen, Globe Staff  |  March 9, 2005

> Hospital computer systems that are widely touted as the best way to
> eliminate dangerous medication mix-ups can actually introduce many
> errors, according to the most comprehensive study of hazards of the
> new technology. The researchers, who shadowed doctors and nurses in a
> Philadelphia hospital for four months, found that some patients were
> put at risk of getting double doses of their medicine while others get
> none at all.

> Doctors at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania identified
> 22 types of mistakes they have made because of difficulty using
> computerized drug-ordering, such as failing to stop old medications
> when adding new ones or forgetting that the computer automatically
> suspended medications after surgery. Some doctors interviewed for the
> study said they made computer-related mistakes several times a week.

> The findings underscore the complexity of improving safety in US
> hospitals, where the Institute of Medicine estimates that errors of
> all kinds kill 44,000 to 98,000 patients a year.

> The University of Pennsylvania researchers stressed that computers
> hold great potential, but said many systems are overhyped and hard to
> use, prompting one Los Angeles hospital to turn off its drug-ordering
> system altogether.

> http://www.boston.com/yourlife/health/other/articles/2005/03/09/drug_error_risk_at_hospitals_tied_to_computers/

Some of those problems are the result of poor design and/or programming as well as poor testing and quality
control.

LB

------------------------------

From: bham <bhamlin3@cox.net>
Subject: Re: Long Distance Carrier Verification
Date: 10 Mar 2005 19:57:18 -0800


If you are getting a busy signal this means that there is most likely
trouble with your local phone company. Whenever you call that number
and you get the name of your long distance company or some other type
of message then the trouble is usually with your long distance carrier.
I would call your local phone company's repair line and advise them
that you are getting a busy signal on the 700 number and they can check
the routing for you. This is really a problem if you are getting a fast
busy which you didn't indicate.

------------------------------

From: bham <bhamlin3@cox.net>
Subject: Re: Phone Doesn't Disconnect
Date: 10 Mar 2005 20:01:26 -0800


Normally should take between 3-15 seconds to disconnect a call. If
trouble persists, disconnect all phones except for one and see if it
still happens. If it doesn't happen anymore the trouble is with one of
the phones you unhooked. If you are still having the trouble see if
you get your dialtone back after 15 seconds. If not, call repair
service at your local phone company to have your line tested to make
sure nothing is wrong. There are a number of issues that could cause
this type of problem that an electronic line test might find out.

------------------------------

From: bham <bhamlin3@cox.net>
Subject: Re: Any Old Mechanical Systems Still in Use in the US?
Date: 10 Mar 2005 20:05:22 -0800


The bells are totally digital. I was told a few years ago that US West
(Qwest) had the last XBAR offices around in Wyoming and now those are
gone. Most large telcos are now in the process converting their older
1ESS switches to either 5ESS or DMS.

------------------------------

From: Lee Sweet <lee@datatel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:57:47 -0500
Subject: Re: Home PBX and VoIP Tie-in


Soren Rathje <soren%lolle.org@spam.me> responded to me:

> Lee Sweet wrote:

[snip]
> Now, what I want to do is have all outbound LD calls go out on the
> Vonage line automatically.  Right now, I have a separate cordless
> phone for that line, but that's not the optimal answer!  :-) 

Soren Rathjes said ...

The short answer is: Asterisk
(www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk)

> 8<snip>8

> and Lee Sweet adds:

> You took the words out of my about-to-reply mouth, and thanks for the 
> added sourceforge info!  Last night I google'd "home pbx" and 
> Asterisk and Digium were near the top.  By purchasing one FXS 
> (station) and one FXO (telco analog line) card for a PC, I figure I 
> can do all I want.

Sounds great from what I've read, and this week I'll download the 
tarball and look at the docs.

Thanks for the second opinion!

(And, for PAT's response re PBXtra, it could *almost* do what I want, 
but I need CLID info, and that's not there.)

Lee Sweet
Datatel, Inc.
Manager of Telephony Services 
   and Information Security
How higher education does business
Voice: 703.968.4661
Fax: 703.968.4625
Cell: 703.932.9425
lee@datatel.com
www.datatel.com



[TELECOM Digest Editor's Note: The way I get Caller-ID was by
first suspending the DISA (the PBXtra was otherwise grabbing 
calls on the first half-ring and providing its own ringing tone
meaning caller-ID never had a chance to get transmitted (between
first and second rings). You suspend DISA by using program code
508000 and another string of numbers, then 'saving' the program
code with 50911. Henceforth the line(s) just ring until they get
answered. To get the caller-ID I tapped both incoming lines (Prairie
Stream and Vonage) into an AT&T two-line splitter and sent the output 
to the (1) single caller-ID display unit and (2) a common audible
or 'side ringer'. By suspending the DISA (thus preventing the
PBXtra from doing 'call supervision' it also permits me to use
my _own_ answering machine/voicemail (which cuts in after a
reasonable number of rings) rather than having PBXtra grab the
incoming call on the first ring and processing it itself and the
two CO's (Vonage and Prairie Stream) thinking the call was answered.
PAT]

------------------------------

From: Wesrock@aol.com
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:48:32 EST
Subject: 107-Year-old Woman From Independence


Pat,

Not telecom related at all, as far as I know, but on the front page of
the Oklahoman Today there was a photo of a 107-year-old woman, now in
an old folks home in McLoud, Oklahoma, who was born in Independence in
1898.  It was her birthday party.


Wes Leatherock
wesrock@aol.com
wleathus@yahoo.com

------------------------------


TELECOM Digest is an electronic journal devoted mostly but not
exclusively to telecommunications topics. It is circulated anywhere
there is email, in addition to various telecom forums on a variety of
networks such as Compuserve and America On Line, Yahoo Groups, and
other forums.  It is also gatewayed to Usenet where it appears as the
moderated newsgroup 'comp.dcom.telecom'.

TELECOM Digest is a not-for-profit, mostly non-commercial educational
service offered to the Internet by Patrick Townson. All the contents
of the Digest are compilation-copyrighted. You may reprint articles in
some other media on an occasional basis, but please attribute my work
and that of the original author.

Contact information:    Patrick Townson/TELECOM Digest
                        Post Office Box 50
                        Independence, KS 67301
                        Phone: 620-402-0134
                        Fax 1: 775-255-9970
                        Fax 2: 530-309-7234
                        Fax 3: 208-692-5145         
                        Email: editor@telecom-digest.org

Subscribe:  telecom-subscribe@telecom-digest.org
Unsubscribe:telecom-unsubscribe@telecom-digest.org

This Digest is the oldest continuing e-journal about telecomm-
unications on the Internet, having been founded in August, 1981 and
published continuously since then.  Our archives are available for
your review/research. We believe we are the oldest e-zine/mailing list
on the internet in any category!

URL information:        http://telecom-digest.org

Anonymous FTP: mirror.lcs.mit.edu/telecom-archives/archives/
  (or use our mirror site: ftp.epix.net/pub/telecom-archives)

Email <==> FTP:  telecom-archives@telecom-digest.org 

      Send a simple, one line note to that automated address for
      a help file on how to use the automatic retrieval system
      for archives files. You can get desired files in email.

*************************************************************************
*   TELECOM Digest is partially funded by a grant from                  *
*   Judith Oppenheimer, President of ICB Inc. and purveyor of accurate  *
*   800 & Dot Com News, Intelligence, Analysis, and Consulting.         *
*   http://ICBTollFree.com, http://1800TheExpert.com                    *
*   Views expressed herein should not be construed as representing      *
*   views of Judith Oppenheimer or ICB Inc.                             *
*************************************************************************

ICB Toll Free News.  Contact information is not sold, rented or leased.

One click a day feeds a person a meal.  Go to http://www.thehungersite.com

Copyright 2004 ICB, Inc. and TELECOM Digest. All rights reserved.
Our attorney is Bill Levant, of Blue Bell, PA.

              ************************

DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE JUST 65 CENTS ONE OR TWO INQUIRIES CHARGED TO
YOUR CREDIT CARD!  REAL TIME, UP TO DATE! SPONSORED BY TELECOM DIGEST
AND EASY411.COM   SIGN UP AT http://www.easy411.com/telecomdigest !

              ************************

Visit http://www.mstm.okstate.edu and take the next step in your
career with a Master of Science in Telecommunications Management
(MSTM) degree from Oklahoma State University (OSU). This 35
credit-hour interdisciplinary program is designed to give you the
skills necessary to manage telecommunications networks, including
data, video, and voice networks.

The MSTM degree draws on the expertise of the OSU's College
of Business Administration; the College of Arts and Sciences; and the
College of Engineering, Architecture and Technology. The program has
state-of-the-art lab facilities on the Stillwater and Tulsa campus
offering hands-on learning to enhance the program curriculum.  Classes
are available in Stillwater, Tulsa, or through distance learning.

Please contact Jay Boyington for additional information at
405-744-9000, mstm-osu@okstate.edu, or visit the MSTM web site at
http://www.mstm.okstate.edu

              ************************

   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Finally, the Digest is funded by gifts from generous readers such as
yourself who provide funding in amounts deemed appropriate. Your help
is important and appreciated. A suggested donation of fifty dollars
per year per reader is considered appropriate. See our address above.
Please make at least a single donation to cover the cost of processing
your name to the mailing list. 

All opinions expressed herein are deemed to be those of the
author. Any organizations listed are for identification purposes only
and messages should not be considered any official expression by the
organization.

End of TELECOM Digest V24 #106
******************************

Return to Archives**Older Issues